WordPress to Sanity Migration: 7 Partners to Consider
Article
A WordPress to Sanity migration should do more than move posts into a new database. It should give developers a maintainable content architecture and give marketers a publishing workflow they can use confidently. We're tired of old legacy systems; that's why moving off WordPress, Drupal, or AEM gives us hope for something scalable and up to date, and price always matters. If the business grows, and it should for sure, we definitely need to find a more optimized option for content management software, and Sanity software copes with it well.P.S: While writing this article, I had no aim to praise or downgrade some specific companies. I saw that the Sanity is gaining momentum, that’s why collected an overview of the professional companies who work with website migrations, with Sanity headless CMS in particular. Don’t take it as another hands-on benchmark of popular web dev companies providing IT service.For teams seeking a full-service partner, FocusReactive leads this shortlist because its published offer brings together WordPress migration, custom Sanity Studio development, frontend implementation, and marketing-team training. Other partners suit different priorities, from technical guidance to broader CMS modernization. Independent statistics: WordPress vs. Sanity, Payload, and other headless CMSsCheck our Website adoption statistics, the table combines CMS market-share estimates from W3Techs with live-website counts from BuiltWith, including its Sanity usage report; these figures describe detected websites, not unique businesses or individually paying customers.PlatformStatistic availableWhat it measuresWordPress39.5% of all websites; 58.2% of websites with an identified CMSW3Techs’ website-based estimates, dated November 1, 2026.SanityLess than 0.1% of websites with an identified CMSW3Techs’ detected CMS market share.Payload
0.1% of websites with an identified CMS; less than 0.1% of all websitesW3Techs’ detected usage.
Sanity
66,778 live websites detected
BuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot, excluding its separately reported historical sites and redirects
Contentful
43,628 live websites detected
BuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot.
Strapi
10,729 live websites detectedBuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot.
Sanity vs. WordPress: what should actually improve?A WordPress to Sanity migration is worth evaluating when your current content structure, publishing workflow, or integration requirements are holding the team back, not simply because a different CMS promises better performance. WordPress offers a familiar editing environment and an extensive plugin ecosystem; Sanity offers code-defined content models, a customizable Studio, and API-based delivery. Neither guarantees a fast website or independent content management: those outcomes depend on the frontend, the editing experience, and CMS implementation.Decision areaWhen keeping WordPress may make senseWhen moving to Sanity CMS deserves considerationWhat your migration partner should demonstrateEveryday publishingEditors already publish articles and landing pages confidently using existing templates and tools.The team needs an editing environment tailored to its content types and recurring tasks.A marketer creates, previews, and updates a representative page without developer assistance.Content reuseMost content is published on a single website, so managing duplicate content is relatively easy.The same content needs to support multiple websites, applications, brands, or channels.One shared content item appears in the required destinations and updates consistently.Content modelingExisting posts, custom post types, and fields adequately represent the business.Content needs more deliberate relationships and reusable structures across products, people, locations, or campaigns.A source-to-target content map, with working references and documented exceptions.Design flexibilityCurrent themes, blocks, or page-builder layouts meet campaign needs.The team wants reusable, brand-controlled components with a custom frontend.Editors assemble an agreed campaign layout, and understand which changes still require developers.PerformanceHosting, caching, images, or scripts can be improved without replacing the CMS.The project also requires a frontend rebuild and a different delivery architecture.Comparable before-and-after measurements on representative pages, including mobile layouts and third-party scripts.SEO ContinuanityExisting URLs and metadata work well, and there is no separate business case for replatforming.The migration solves a broader content or architecture problem, with search continuity explicitly in scope.A URL inventory, redirect mapping, metadata checks, and crawl-based launch validation—not a ranking guarantee.1. FocusReactive: WordPress to Sanity migration with engineering and editorial workflows togetherFocusReactive is the strongest starting point on this list for teams that want one partner to address the content migration, website architecture, and day-to-day editing experience. Sanity lists FocusReactive as an agency partner and describes its work around scalable content systems. FocusReactive’s dedicated WordPress migration service covers content and media, a custom Sanity Studio, a Next.js frontend, and training intended to help marketing teams work independently. What stands out for developersFocusReactive describes an approach in which the Studio, content schemas, and rendering strategy are designed together. That is particularly relevant when moving away from WordPress: transferring existing HTML without reconsidering the content model can preserve the very limitations that prompted the migration.Eugene Boruhov, Headless CMS Solution Architect at FocusReactive, explains the benefit this way:“Sanity gave us the content model flexibility we needed to build a truly composable website.”This is the agency’s own technical perspective, not an independent review. Its value is the implementation principle behind it: structure content around how the team works, rather than merely reproducing the old administration screens.Time zones: UK (GMT/BST), Central European Time (CET/CEST). Offices in London, Amsterdam, Warsaw, and New York, globally remote.Best for: Mid-market and enterprise businesses comparing Sanit vs. WordPress, for businesses that need technical architecture, custom Sanity Studio development, and independent editorial workflows.What stands out for content marketersFocusReactive’s Sanity portfolio includes feedback from Mike Addonizio, VP of Marketing at Betway:“They helped us build two modern, SEO-friendly marketing websites that our marketing team can easily manage without relying on developers.”That is relevant evidence of marketing usability in the agency’s Sanity portfolio. It should not, however, be read as proof that this specific engagement was a WordPress-to-Sanity migration.FocusReactive also publishes feedback from Financial Team’s founding partner, Michael Koenig, about a Sanity and Vercel website delivered with SEO and compliance requirements in mind. Together, these examples support its positioning around both technical delivery and usable marketing websites.Treat claims such as “zero SEO loss” as a service ambition, not a guaranteed search outcome. Sanity’s own migration guidance emphasizes URL audits, redirects, and broken-link checks to reduce migration risk.2. Roboto Studio: WordPress to Sanity migration with a public technical starting pointRoboto Studio deserves consideration for teams that want to understand the migration mechanics before commissioning a project.Its public walkthrough explains how a WordPress XML export can be transformed into Sanity documents using a community migration repository. It also distinguishes relatively straightforward content sites from more complicated page-builder implementations.What stands out for developersThe article shows how the import is assembled rather than treating migration as a black box. It also makes an important limitation explicit: the repository is older, may require modifications, and can produce missing references or omitted content.That transparency makes the walkthrough useful for evaluating a proof of concept. It does not make the example script a complete production migration system.What stands out for content marketersRoboto describes its editorial approach as “designing on rails”: editors choose predefined components and supply content, while the frontend controls the visual presentation. This can provide useful guardrails, but the article also acknowledges that editors do not have unrestricted design control.Ask to see how its proposed Studio handles your real campaign layouts, preview requirements, and recurring content updates. The key question is not whether the import runs—it is whether the resulting workflow suits the people publishing every week.Time zones: US Central Time (CT). US-based team working primarily US business hours. Remote collaboration is available.Best for: Performance-focused businesses that want a highly customized Sanity and Next.js website, strong Core Web Vitals, and advanced content modeling. Particularly relevant for technically ambitious teams and companies with demanding frontend requirements3. Operation Nation: WordPress to Sanity migration with an SEO and content-strategy focus
Operation Nation is worth evaluating when the migration sits within a wider marketing and search strategy. Its Sanity partner profile explicitly lists WordPress-to-Sanity migrations alongside SEO, content strategy, conversion-rate optimization, and performance-focused websites.Why it belongs on the shortlistThis combination is relevant when the project involves more than a platform change. For instance, reorganizing a content library or improving how landing pages support acquisition. Its published profile establishes the service offering, but not a standardized migration performance result. Ask for evidence showing how it has handled URL preservation, changed information architecture, and editorial workflows on comparable projects.Time zones: Global agency. Its public Sanity profile does not specify a headquarters or standard working hours. Confirm time-zone overlap during the initial consultation.Best for: SaaS, Web3, and technology startups that want to combine a WordPress-to-Sanity migration with SEO, content strategy, conversion optimization, and ongoing marketing support4. Multidots: WordPress to Sanity migration for a broader CMS modernization brief
Multidots is an option for organizations considering Sanity as part of a larger legacy-platform modernization. Its Sanity partner profile lists migrations from WordPress, Drupal, and Sitecore. The company also positions itself around enterprise WordPress and Sanity work, including redesigns, migrations, and replatforming.Why it belongs on the shortlistIts published positioning makes it relevant to buyers who want to discuss the existing WordPress environment as well as the destination platform. Before choosing a partner, request an inventory of the functionality that will move, be rebuilt, or be retired. For marketers, the equivalent question is equally important: which everyday publishing tasks will remain self-service after launch?The public service descriptions support including Multidots as a candidate; they do not establish that it is the best fit for every enterprise migration.Time zones: US Central Time (CT), UK time (GMT/BST), and Indian Standard Time (IST). Multidots publishes working hours of 9 AM–5 PM Central Time for its US team and 10 AM–7 PM IST for its India team.Best for: Enterprise organizations modernizing complex legacy CMS environments, particularly those migrating from WordPress, Drupal, or Sitecore and requiring broader platform modernization, integrations, and ongoing support.5. 8 West Consulting: WordPress to Sanity migration within complex integration projects8 West Consulting is a candidate when migration forms part of a wider integration or platform-upgrade program.Its Sanity partner profile describes the company as specializing in complex integrations, migrations, and upgrades, and lists experience across Sanity, WordPress, Umbraco, Drupal, Sitecore, and Adobe Experience Manager.Why it belongs on the shortlistThe relevant distinction is breadth of systems work. A migration brief may need to address more than articles and landing pages, especially when content connects to other business systems.Its profile supports that broader positioning, but does not by itself prove a particular WordPress-to-Sanity delivery history. Ask for a comparable reference and a clear explanation of where content, integrations, and publishing responsibilities will sit after the move.Time zones: Ireland (GMT/IST), US Pacific and Eastern working-hour coverage through its Seattle office, and Eastern European Time (EET/EEST) through its Cluj-Napoca office.Best for: Enterprises with complex integration requirements, multiple legacy systems, and migration projects involving broader infrastructure modernization, security, and system upgrades.6. HireDevs: WordPress to Sanity migration for teams assessing integration supportHireDevs explicitly lists migrations from and integrations with traditional CMS platforms, including WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, and Drupal, in its Sanity partner profile.Why it belongs on the shortlistThat makes it a relevant candidate for a migration brief involving both content transfer and continued interaction with existing systems. The public listing establishes service relevance, not implementation quality or editor satisfaction. During evaluation, ask the team to demonstrate how imported content becomes usable Sanity documents, how references are checked, and how editors preview the resulting pages.Sanity’s official migration course provides a useful baseline for that discussion: it covers authors, taxonomy, assets, rich-text transformation, and Studio configuration—not just importing post bodies.Time zones: Distributed teams across the United States, Canada, and Europe. Working-hour overlap can be discussed when selecting the delivery team.Best for: Businesses that need senior engineering capacity, technical leadership, and hands-on development support for CMS migrations and broader modernization projects. Particularly relevant when a migration requires experienced engineers to work alongside an existing product or engineering team.7. Otterdev: WordPress to Sanity migration as an explicitly listed serviceOtterdev’s Sanity partner profile directly lists CMS migrations, including WordPress to Sanity. That makes it another relevant agency to include in a focused request for proposals.Why it belongs on the shortlistThe benefit here is a clear match between the advertised service and the project category. The next step is to test that match against the complexity of your own website.Request a representative migration sample before committing to the full project. Include difficult content, so that you can evaluate image handling, embedded content, rich text, and editor usability.The available public profile supports its inclusion as a candidate, but does not justify claims about faster delivery, lower costs, or superior outcomes.What developers and marketers should expect from a WordPress to Sanity migrationThe most useful Sanity benefits emerge when technical flexibility translates into easier publishing.Developers: structured content instead of presentation-bound HTMLSanity’s migration guidance distinguishes between converting rendered HTML and processing raw WordPress blocks. Its tooling can transform content into Portable Text, a structured rich-text format, while custom conversion rules handle elements that do not map cleanly to standard paragraphs, headings, and lists.This flexibility is valuable, but it also creates implementation work. A successful migration needs deliberate rules for custom blocks, images, references, and frontend rendering—not an assumption that all WordPress markup will convert correctly.Time zones: Singapore Time (SGT, UTC+8). Headquartered in Singapore, with a distributed team and clients in the US, Australia, and Singapore.Best for: Mid-market businesses, particularly in APAC, looking for a hands-on WordPress-to-Sanity migration, modern Next.js development, UX improvements, and ongoing website support. Its published Ciberspring case study provides a relevant example of a WordPress-to-Sanity migration.Marketers: fewer routine requests to engineering teamKatie Greer, Growth Marketing Manager, Acquisition at Amplitude, describes the organizational benefit:“Thanks to Sanity my engineering team no longer spends time on customer requests that don’t drive top-line metrics.”The useful takeaway is not that Sanity removes the need for developers. It is that a well-designed implementation can shift routine content work away from engineering, leaving developers available for higher-impact projects.Editors: preview and reusable components can improve daily workSanity’s AETHER customer story describes content and marketing teams creating product pages and updating landing pages without asking developers for help. It also reports benefits from live previews and image adjustments inside the Studio.Prima’s customer story offers another editorial perspective: its editorial team named Sanity its favorite content-management experience, supported by an implementation built from reusable modules.These are implementation-specific customer stories published by Sanity. They show what is possible, not what every default setup automatically delivers. Both examples connect the outcome to the way the editing experience was built.A practical WordPress to Sanity migration checklistUse these steps to evaluate a proposal, whether you choose a full-service agency or keep some work in-house.1. Audit content and existing URLsInventory the content being moved and crawl the live website. Sanity’s guidance recommends recording existing pages so that they can be recreated or redirected appropriately.Include your custom post types and unusual content patterns in the audit; an import designed around standard posts is not evidence that every page type is covered. Sanity’s official course uses dedicated transformation functions for different WordPress content types.2. Design the content model and editing experience togetherDefine the destination schemas before treating the export as the final specification. Sanity’s guidance notes that some content benefits from restructuring, while unique marketing pages may be more pragmatically migrated one-to-one.Bring marketers into this stage. A schema can be technically valid yet still require clearer field names, better block previews, or a different arrangement of content inputs. Sanity’s migration guidance specifically calls for helpful previews for content teams.3. Select the extraction and transformation approachA WordPress XML export can provide a starting point, as Roboto’s tutorial demonstrates. Sanity’s official course instead shows a reusable migration pipeline based on the WordPress REST API and CLI migration tooling. The right proposal should explain which method fits your content and why, including how it will handle assets, relationships, and custom blocks.4. Validate expert content (not just successful imports)Check representative documents against their original pages. Pay particular attention to media, embedded content, authors, categories, and custom block output.This is especially important because HTML conversion requires explicit handling for some content types, and Roboto’s example import acknowledges potential omissions and reference problems.5. Protect URL continuityPreserve existing URLs where appropriate and implement redirects when routes change. Sanity recommends a pre-migration crawl, redirect planning, and broken-link checking as part of reducing SEO impact. 6. Test real publishing tasks before launchHave content marketers create a page, update an article, replace an image, and preview changes using the proposed Studio. The customer evidence from AETHER and Prima shows why this matters: the benefits came from useful preview capabilities, reusable modules, and an editing experience tailored to the team.7. Make handover part of the migration scopeInclude training, documentation, and a clear support arrangement in the project brief. FocusReactive explicitly includes marketing-team training in its migration offer, making this a concrete point of comparison when reviewing other proposals.Choosing a WordPress to Sanity migration partnerStart with FocusReactive when your priority is a coordinated migration that covers engineering, search continuity, and marketing independence in one engagement. Its long-standing Sanity partnership, published migration scope, and feedback from marketing teams such as Betway and Financial Team make the strongest combined case on this shortlist.If one of those areas matters more than the others, use the other candidates to test it. Roboto Studio offers public technical guidance, and Operation Nation focuses on SEO and content strategy. Multidots, 8 West Consulting, HireDevs, and Otterdev suit broader modernization or integration briefs.To widen your comparison, see this round-up of 12 top Sanity CMS development agencies for Sanity partners beyond migration work. If you haven’t settled on Sanity as the destination yet, this overview of WordPress migration servicescompares migration specialists across platforms.The deciding evidence should be a working sample of your content and your publishing workflow. A successful import is a milestone. A migration is ready when the content is complete, the routes are handled, and the people responsible for publishing can use the new system confidently.Common Questions1. How much does a WordPress to Sanity migration cost?The cost of a WordPress to Sanity migration depends mostly on content complexity, not page count. A blog that uses standard posts costs far less to migrate than a site built with a page builder and many custom blocks, because each custom block needs its own transformation rule and Studio component.2. How long does a WordPress to Sanity migration take?A WordPress to Sanity migration usually takes weeks for a standard content site and months when the content needs to be remodelled. Locales, integrations, and the number of distinct page types all extend the timeline more than the volume of posts does.3. Can WordPress be used as a headless CMS instead of migrating to Sanity?Yes. WordPress can run headless through its REST API or WPGraphQL, with a Next.js frontend. This keeps the familiar editor, but you still maintain WordPress hosting, plugins, and security, and the content model stays less flexible than Sanity’s code-defined schemas.4. Can you migrate from WordPress to Sanity in phases?Yes. A phased WordPress to Sanity migration moves one section at a time while the rest stays on WordPress. For example, you can move the blog first and route those URLs to the new frontend. This lowers launch risk, but you will be running two systems until the migration is finished.5. What happens to WordPress plugins after moving to Sanity?WordPress plugins do not carry over to Sanity. Their functions are rebuilt as schema fields or external services instead. For example, Yoast SEO fields become an SEO object in the Sanity schema, and form plugins are replaced by a form service connected to the frontend.6. Do editors need training to switch from WordPress to Sanity?Yes. Editors need short, workflow-specific training, because Sanity Studio is configured per project rather than being a standard admin screen like wp-admin. Training works best when it is built around real tasks such as publishing an article, building a landing page from components, and previewing changes.7. Who owns the content and code after a Sanity migration?After a Sanity migration, the client should own the Sanity project, the code repository, and the hosting accounts. Put this in the contract before work starts, because content held in an agency-owned project is difficult to move later.
0.1% of websites with an identified CMS; less than 0.1% of all websitesW3Techs’ detected usage.
Sanity
66,778 live websites detected
BuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot, excluding its separately reported historical sites and redirects
Contentful
43,628 live websites detected
BuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot.
Strapi
10,729 live websites detectedBuiltWith’s live-site count in the retrieved snapshot.
Sanity vs. WordPress: what should actually improve?A WordPress to Sanity migration is worth evaluating when your current content structure, publishing workflow, or integration requirements are holding the team back, not simply because a different CMS promises better performance. WordPress offers a familiar editing environment and an extensive plugin ecosystem; Sanity offers code-defined content models, a customizable Studio, and API-based delivery. Neither guarantees a fast website or independent content management: those outcomes depend on the frontend, the editing experience, and CMS implementation.Decision areaWhen keeping WordPress may make senseWhen moving to Sanity CMS deserves considerationWhat your migration partner should demonstrateEveryday publishingEditors already publish articles and landing pages confidently using existing templates and tools.The team needs an editing environment tailored to its content types and recurring tasks.A marketer creates, previews, and updates a representative page without developer assistance.Content reuseMost content is published on a single website, so managing duplicate content is relatively easy.The same content needs to support multiple websites, applications, brands, or channels.One shared content item appears in the required destinations and updates consistently.Content modelingExisting posts, custom post types, and fields adequately represent the business.Content needs more deliberate relationships and reusable structures across products, people, locations, or campaigns.A source-to-target content map, with working references and documented exceptions.Design flexibilityCurrent themes, blocks, or page-builder layouts meet campaign needs.The team wants reusable, brand-controlled components with a custom frontend.Editors assemble an agreed campaign layout, and understand which changes still require developers.PerformanceHosting, caching, images, or scripts can be improved without replacing the CMS.The project also requires a frontend rebuild and a different delivery architecture.Comparable before-and-after measurements on representative pages, including mobile layouts and third-party scripts.SEO ContinuanityExisting URLs and metadata work well, and there is no separate business case for replatforming.The migration solves a broader content or architecture problem, with search continuity explicitly in scope.A URL inventory, redirect mapping, metadata checks, and crawl-based launch validation—not a ranking guarantee.1. FocusReactive: WordPress to Sanity migration with engineering and editorial workflows togetherFocusReactive is the strongest starting point on this list for teams that want one partner to address the content migration, website architecture, and day-to-day editing experience. Sanity lists FocusReactive as an agency partner and describes its work around scalable content systems. FocusReactive’s dedicated WordPress migration service covers content and media, a custom Sanity Studio, a Next.js frontend, and training intended to help marketing teams work independently. What stands out for developersFocusReactive describes an approach in which the Studio, content schemas, and rendering strategy are designed together. That is particularly relevant when moving away from WordPress: transferring existing HTML without reconsidering the content model can preserve the very limitations that prompted the migration.Eugene Boruhov, Headless CMS Solution Architect at FocusReactive, explains the benefit this way:“Sanity gave us the content model flexibility we needed to build a truly composable website.”This is the agency’s own technical perspective, not an independent review. Its value is the implementation principle behind it: structure content around how the team works, rather than merely reproducing the old administration screens.Time zones: UK (GMT/BST), Central European Time (CET/CEST). Offices in London, Amsterdam, Warsaw, and New York, globally remote.Best for: Mid-market and enterprise businesses comparing Sanit vs. WordPress, for businesses that need technical architecture, custom Sanity Studio development, and independent editorial workflows.What stands out for content marketersFocusReactive’s Sanity portfolio includes feedback from Mike Addonizio, VP of Marketing at Betway:“They helped us build two modern, SEO-friendly marketing websites that our marketing team can easily manage without relying on developers.”That is relevant evidence of marketing usability in the agency’s Sanity portfolio. It should not, however, be read as proof that this specific engagement was a WordPress-to-Sanity migration.FocusReactive also publishes feedback from Financial Team’s founding partner, Michael Koenig, about a Sanity and Vercel website delivered with SEO and compliance requirements in mind. Together, these examples support its positioning around both technical delivery and usable marketing websites.Treat claims such as “zero SEO loss” as a service ambition, not a guaranteed search outcome. Sanity’s own migration guidance emphasizes URL audits, redirects, and broken-link checks to reduce migration risk.2. Roboto Studio: WordPress to Sanity migration with a public technical starting pointRoboto Studio deserves consideration for teams that want to understand the migration mechanics before commissioning a project.Its public walkthrough explains how a WordPress XML export can be transformed into Sanity documents using a community migration repository. It also distinguishes relatively straightforward content sites from more complicated page-builder implementations.What stands out for developersThe article shows how the import is assembled rather than treating migration as a black box. It also makes an important limitation explicit: the repository is older, may require modifications, and can produce missing references or omitted content.That transparency makes the walkthrough useful for evaluating a proof of concept. It does not make the example script a complete production migration system.What stands out for content marketersRoboto describes its editorial approach as “designing on rails”: editors choose predefined components and supply content, while the frontend controls the visual presentation. This can provide useful guardrails, but the article also acknowledges that editors do not have unrestricted design control.Ask to see how its proposed Studio handles your real campaign layouts, preview requirements, and recurring content updates. The key question is not whether the import runs—it is whether the resulting workflow suits the people publishing every week.Time zones: US Central Time (CT). US-based team working primarily US business hours. Remote collaboration is available.Best for: Performance-focused businesses that want a highly customized Sanity and Next.js website, strong Core Web Vitals, and advanced content modeling. Particularly relevant for technically ambitious teams and companies with demanding frontend requirements3. Operation Nation: WordPress to Sanity migration with an SEO and content-strategy focus
Operation Nation is worth evaluating when the migration sits within a wider marketing and search strategy. Its Sanity partner profile explicitly lists WordPress-to-Sanity migrations alongside SEO, content strategy, conversion-rate optimization, and performance-focused websites.Why it belongs on the shortlistThis combination is relevant when the project involves more than a platform change. For instance, reorganizing a content library or improving how landing pages support acquisition. Its published profile establishes the service offering, but not a standardized migration performance result. Ask for evidence showing how it has handled URL preservation, changed information architecture, and editorial workflows on comparable projects.Time zones: Global agency. Its public Sanity profile does not specify a headquarters or standard working hours. Confirm time-zone overlap during the initial consultation.Best for: SaaS, Web3, and technology startups that want to combine a WordPress-to-Sanity migration with SEO, content strategy, conversion optimization, and ongoing marketing support4. Multidots: WordPress to Sanity migration for a broader CMS modernization brief
Multidots is an option for organizations considering Sanity as part of a larger legacy-platform modernization. Its Sanity partner profile lists migrations from WordPress, Drupal, and Sitecore. The company also positions itself around enterprise WordPress and Sanity work, including redesigns, migrations, and replatforming.Why it belongs on the shortlistIts published positioning makes it relevant to buyers who want to discuss the existing WordPress environment as well as the destination platform. Before choosing a partner, request an inventory of the functionality that will move, be rebuilt, or be retired. For marketers, the equivalent question is equally important: which everyday publishing tasks will remain self-service after launch?The public service descriptions support including Multidots as a candidate; they do not establish that it is the best fit for every enterprise migration.Time zones: US Central Time (CT), UK time (GMT/BST), and Indian Standard Time (IST). Multidots publishes working hours of 9 AM–5 PM Central Time for its US team and 10 AM–7 PM IST for its India team.Best for: Enterprise organizations modernizing complex legacy CMS environments, particularly those migrating from WordPress, Drupal, or Sitecore and requiring broader platform modernization, integrations, and ongoing support.5. 8 West Consulting: WordPress to Sanity migration within complex integration projects8 West Consulting is a candidate when migration forms part of a wider integration or platform-upgrade program.Its Sanity partner profile describes the company as specializing in complex integrations, migrations, and upgrades, and lists experience across Sanity, WordPress, Umbraco, Drupal, Sitecore, and Adobe Experience Manager.Why it belongs on the shortlistThe relevant distinction is breadth of systems work. A migration brief may need to address more than articles and landing pages, especially when content connects to other business systems.Its profile supports that broader positioning, but does not by itself prove a particular WordPress-to-Sanity delivery history. Ask for a comparable reference and a clear explanation of where content, integrations, and publishing responsibilities will sit after the move.Time zones: Ireland (GMT/IST), US Pacific and Eastern working-hour coverage through its Seattle office, and Eastern European Time (EET/EEST) through its Cluj-Napoca office.Best for: Enterprises with complex integration requirements, multiple legacy systems, and migration projects involving broader infrastructure modernization, security, and system upgrades.6. HireDevs: WordPress to Sanity migration for teams assessing integration supportHireDevs explicitly lists migrations from and integrations with traditional CMS platforms, including WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, and Drupal, in its Sanity partner profile.Why it belongs on the shortlistThat makes it a relevant candidate for a migration brief involving both content transfer and continued interaction with existing systems. The public listing establishes service relevance, not implementation quality or editor satisfaction. During evaluation, ask the team to demonstrate how imported content becomes usable Sanity documents, how references are checked, and how editors preview the resulting pages.Sanity’s official migration course provides a useful baseline for that discussion: it covers authors, taxonomy, assets, rich-text transformation, and Studio configuration—not just importing post bodies.Time zones: Distributed teams across the United States, Canada, and Europe. Working-hour overlap can be discussed when selecting the delivery team.Best for: Businesses that need senior engineering capacity, technical leadership, and hands-on development support for CMS migrations and broader modernization projects. Particularly relevant when a migration requires experienced engineers to work alongside an existing product or engineering team.7. Otterdev: WordPress to Sanity migration as an explicitly listed serviceOtterdev’s Sanity partner profile directly lists CMS migrations, including WordPress to Sanity. That makes it another relevant agency to include in a focused request for proposals.Why it belongs on the shortlistThe benefit here is a clear match between the advertised service and the project category. The next step is to test that match against the complexity of your own website.Request a representative migration sample before committing to the full project. Include difficult content, so that you can evaluate image handling, embedded content, rich text, and editor usability.The available public profile supports its inclusion as a candidate, but does not justify claims about faster delivery, lower costs, or superior outcomes.What developers and marketers should expect from a WordPress to Sanity migrationThe most useful Sanity benefits emerge when technical flexibility translates into easier publishing.Developers: structured content instead of presentation-bound HTMLSanity’s migration guidance distinguishes between converting rendered HTML and processing raw WordPress blocks. Its tooling can transform content into Portable Text, a structured rich-text format, while custom conversion rules handle elements that do not map cleanly to standard paragraphs, headings, and lists.This flexibility is valuable, but it also creates implementation work. A successful migration needs deliberate rules for custom blocks, images, references, and frontend rendering—not an assumption that all WordPress markup will convert correctly.Time zones: Singapore Time (SGT, UTC+8). Headquartered in Singapore, with a distributed team and clients in the US, Australia, and Singapore.Best for: Mid-market businesses, particularly in APAC, looking for a hands-on WordPress-to-Sanity migration, modern Next.js development, UX improvements, and ongoing website support. Its published Ciberspring case study provides a relevant example of a WordPress-to-Sanity migration.Marketers: fewer routine requests to engineering teamKatie Greer, Growth Marketing Manager, Acquisition at Amplitude, describes the organizational benefit:“Thanks to Sanity my engineering team no longer spends time on customer requests that don’t drive top-line metrics.”The useful takeaway is not that Sanity removes the need for developers. It is that a well-designed implementation can shift routine content work away from engineering, leaving developers available for higher-impact projects.Editors: preview and reusable components can improve daily workSanity’s AETHER customer story describes content and marketing teams creating product pages and updating landing pages without asking developers for help. It also reports benefits from live previews and image adjustments inside the Studio.Prima’s customer story offers another editorial perspective: its editorial team named Sanity its favorite content-management experience, supported by an implementation built from reusable modules.These are implementation-specific customer stories published by Sanity. They show what is possible, not what every default setup automatically delivers. Both examples connect the outcome to the way the editing experience was built.A practical WordPress to Sanity migration checklistUse these steps to evaluate a proposal, whether you choose a full-service agency or keep some work in-house.1. Audit content and existing URLsInventory the content being moved and crawl the live website. Sanity’s guidance recommends recording existing pages so that they can be recreated or redirected appropriately.Include your custom post types and unusual content patterns in the audit; an import designed around standard posts is not evidence that every page type is covered. Sanity’s official course uses dedicated transformation functions for different WordPress content types.2. Design the content model and editing experience togetherDefine the destination schemas before treating the export as the final specification. Sanity’s guidance notes that some content benefits from restructuring, while unique marketing pages may be more pragmatically migrated one-to-one.Bring marketers into this stage. A schema can be technically valid yet still require clearer field names, better block previews, or a different arrangement of content inputs. Sanity’s migration guidance specifically calls for helpful previews for content teams.3. Select the extraction and transformation approachA WordPress XML export can provide a starting point, as Roboto’s tutorial demonstrates. Sanity’s official course instead shows a reusable migration pipeline based on the WordPress REST API and CLI migration tooling. The right proposal should explain which method fits your content and why, including how it will handle assets, relationships, and custom blocks.4. Validate expert content (not just successful imports)Check representative documents against their original pages. Pay particular attention to media, embedded content, authors, categories, and custom block output.This is especially important because HTML conversion requires explicit handling for some content types, and Roboto’s example import acknowledges potential omissions and reference problems.5. Protect URL continuityPreserve existing URLs where appropriate and implement redirects when routes change. Sanity recommends a pre-migration crawl, redirect planning, and broken-link checking as part of reducing SEO impact. 6. Test real publishing tasks before launchHave content marketers create a page, update an article, replace an image, and preview changes using the proposed Studio. The customer evidence from AETHER and Prima shows why this matters: the benefits came from useful preview capabilities, reusable modules, and an editing experience tailored to the team.7. Make handover part of the migration scopeInclude training, documentation, and a clear support arrangement in the project brief. FocusReactive explicitly includes marketing-team training in its migration offer, making this a concrete point of comparison when reviewing other proposals.Choosing a WordPress to Sanity migration partnerStart with FocusReactive when your priority is a coordinated migration that covers engineering, search continuity, and marketing independence in one engagement. Its long-standing Sanity partnership, published migration scope, and feedback from marketing teams such as Betway and Financial Team make the strongest combined case on this shortlist.If one of those areas matters more than the others, use the other candidates to test it. Roboto Studio offers public technical guidance, and Operation Nation focuses on SEO and content strategy. Multidots, 8 West Consulting, HireDevs, and Otterdev suit broader modernization or integration briefs.To widen your comparison, see this round-up of 12 top Sanity CMS development agencies for Sanity partners beyond migration work. If you haven’t settled on Sanity as the destination yet, this overview of WordPress migration servicescompares migration specialists across platforms.The deciding evidence should be a working sample of your content and your publishing workflow. A successful import is a milestone. A migration is ready when the content is complete, the routes are handled, and the people responsible for publishing can use the new system confidently.Common Questions1. How much does a WordPress to Sanity migration cost?The cost of a WordPress to Sanity migration depends mostly on content complexity, not page count. A blog that uses standard posts costs far less to migrate than a site built with a page builder and many custom blocks, because each custom block needs its own transformation rule and Studio component.2. How long does a WordPress to Sanity migration take?A WordPress to Sanity migration usually takes weeks for a standard content site and months when the content needs to be remodelled. Locales, integrations, and the number of distinct page types all extend the timeline more than the volume of posts does.3. Can WordPress be used as a headless CMS instead of migrating to Sanity?Yes. WordPress can run headless through its REST API or WPGraphQL, with a Next.js frontend. This keeps the familiar editor, but you still maintain WordPress hosting, plugins, and security, and the content model stays less flexible than Sanity’s code-defined schemas.4. Can you migrate from WordPress to Sanity in phases?Yes. A phased WordPress to Sanity migration moves one section at a time while the rest stays on WordPress. For example, you can move the blog first and route those URLs to the new frontend. This lowers launch risk, but you will be running two systems until the migration is finished.5. What happens to WordPress plugins after moving to Sanity?WordPress plugins do not carry over to Sanity. Their functions are rebuilt as schema fields or external services instead. For example, Yoast SEO fields become an SEO object in the Sanity schema, and form plugins are replaced by a form service connected to the frontend.6. Do editors need training to switch from WordPress to Sanity?Yes. Editors need short, workflow-specific training, because Sanity Studio is configured per project rather than being a standard admin screen like wp-admin. Training works best when it is built around real tasks such as publishing an article, building a landing page from components, and previewing changes.7. Who owns the content and code after a Sanity migration?After a Sanity migration, the client should own the Sanity project, the code repository, and the hosting accounts. Put this in the contract before work starts, because content held in an agency-owned project is difficult to move later.
