#web development

ReactJS is wildly popular and thus wildly supported. TypeScript is increasingly popular, and thus increasingly supported.

The two together? Not as much. Given that they both change quickly, it's hard to find accurate learning materials.

React+TypeScript, with JetBrains IDEs? That three-part combination is the topic of this series. We'll show a little about a lot. Meaning, the key steps to getting productive, in the IDE, for React projects using TypeScript. Along the way we'll show test-driven development and emphasize tips-and-tricks in the IDE.

In this workshop, you'll learn how to build your first full stack dapp on the Ethereum blockchain, reading and writing data to the network, and connecting a front end application to the contract you've deployed. By the end of the workshop, you'll understand how to set up a full stack development environment, run a local node, and interact with any smart contract using React, HardHat, and Ethers.js.

If you are looking for a Sanity CMS developer or a development team to run your content operations software migration, this guide gives you a verified shortlist and the exact questions to ask before signing anything. Most "Top Sanity CMS Agencies" lists are written by Sanity agencies and Sanity development companies trying to rank themselves. That's not automatically a problem, but it means rankings move based on whoever owns the URL, not who's actually shipping the best work. This listicle of popular Sanity agencies, with evaluation criteria, ratings, time zones, target audiences, common projects, and a decision tree was written to help you pick the right Sanity partner. This is a way to approach finding your best development agency wisely, not just by typing ‘find best Sanity agency’, but using your critical thinking skills.These numbers show why the “right‑tool‑for‑the‑job” approach matters: small teams move faster, larger enterprises scale content across channels, and digital marketers ship campaigns without waiting on dev tickets.Sanity CMS development services: market context and trends (2026)The headless CMS market is no longer a niche developer preference — it is the dominant architecture for new digital builds. The global market reached $297 billion in 2026 and is on track for $678 billion by 2035, growing at a 9.6% compound annual rate, driven by API-first development, omnichannel content demands, and AI workflow integration. Within that market, Sanity has moved faster than most competitors by pivoting from pure CMS positioning to what it now calls a Content Operating System — infrastructure for structured content that feeds websites, mobile apps, AI agents, and internal tools from a single hosted data layer.Three trends are accelerating demand for Sanity CMS development services specifically in 2026. First, the AI content operations shift: Sanity is the only major headless CMS with a native MCP Server, giving development teams using Claude Code or Cursor direct programmatic access to content — creating, querying, and patching documents from inside their AI coding environment. Enterprises building AI-assisted editorial workflows are increasingly choosing Sanity precisely because it is the only platform that treats content as agent-readable structured data by design. Second, the Contentful exodus: Contentful's pricing scales aggressively at volume, and mid-market teams that outgrow the free tier are migrating at an accelerating rate. Sanity's flexible document model and more predictable pricing have made it the default migration target for teams moving off Contentful. Third, the composable commerce trend: DTC and e-commerce brands are replacing monolithic Shopify themes with headless storefronts where Sanity powers the content layer and Shopify handles transactions — a setup that requires specialist Sanity developers who understand both platforms. Sanity holds a 4.7/5 rating from over 900 verified G2 reviews, the highest in the headless CMS category, and is trusted in production by Anthropic, Shopify, Figma, PUMA, Spotify, and National Geographic.The listed Sanity agencies are grouped by evaluation criteria that helps to choose your developer based on your business situation. Assess your budget and check on several reasonable criteria of Sanity agency achievements and the agency' market positioning.What is Sanity CMS Agency?A Sanity CMS agency is a team of experienced web developers and engineers that specializes in building, customizing, and maintaining digital solutions using the Sanity content platform. These agencies help businesses create scalable content management systems, develop custom integrations, optimize content management, and improve various marketing workflows that meet specific business needs.Why are teams switching to Sanity CMS in 2026?Sanity CMS popularity is evident, Anthropic, Shopify, Figma, National Geographic, Unilever, and other prominent names and brands use Sanity CMS daily, and trust it for proven flexibility, as the CMS is loved for clear real-time editing, customizable workspace with Sanity Studio, and general flexibility. Many devs love Sanity for offering robust APIs and supporting frontend frameworks like Next.js, Astro, and Nuxt. Since 2021, after a Sanity breakout year, the company has become one of the leader in content management software, plus, around 33,000 websites use Sanity for various needs, translating to a market share of approximately 0.2% in the top 1 million sites. On GitHub, Sanity platform has 1.3k followers and more than 2.7million of downloads that is really inspiring.We've picked Sanity CMS from many content management software options, and tried to evaluate why editorial teams migrate from traditional content systems switching to headless ones, and to Sanity in particular. Here’s a succinct table with the main reasons for this choice:TriggerWhat They're LeavingWhat They GainOutgrowing rigid structuresGhost, WordPressFlexible content modeling, reusable content blocksWorkflow frustrationPayload, self-hosted CMSesLive preview, draft management, no "push to staging"SEO plugin dependencyWordPress + YoastSchema built directly, predictable structured dataAI dev workflow needsAny legacy CMSSanity MCP for Claude/Cursor integrationContent management should be easy for everyone involved. This includes content managers, marketers, product managers, and developers. These team members maintain and configure the CMS for better usability. Sanity.io supports this balance well.What developers and marketers actually say about Sanity CMS (top 5 reasons to use it — and 5 reasons not to)The following is drawn from G2 verified reviews (900+ reviews, rated 4.7/5), practitioner assessments, and community feedback across Reddit, dev.to, and direct user reports. Not marketing copy.5 Reasons People Love Sanity1. Schema-as-code that survives real editorial complexity The most consistent theme across developer reviews is that Sanity's content model — defined in TypeScript, living in version control, and adaptable to any data shape — removes the ceiling that rigid CMSes impose. As one verified G2 reviewer put it: the schema scales with the project instead of fighting it on the next page request. Engineers working with government websites, SaaS platforms, and e-commerce catalogs all cite this as the reason they would not go back to WordPress or Contentful.2. Real-time collaboration that feels like Google Docs Multiple reviewers across G2 and Reddit describe Sanity Studio's collaborative editing as the first CMS that genuinely eliminates the "who has this document open" problem. Multiple editors can work on the same document simultaneously without overwriting each other's changes — a capability that for many teams replaced entire Slack threads of coordination overhead.3. GROQ makes complex content relationships trivial Developers who invest in learning GROQ consistently report it as a productivity multiplier. The ability to write deeply nested joins, filters, and projections in a single query — returning exactly the data shape the frontend needs — eliminates the multiple REST requests that equivalent GraphQL setups require. The initial GROQ learning curve is real (see below), but practitioners rate it highly once past it.4. The Studio is genuinely usable by non-technical editors Unlike many developer-first tools that produce admin interfaces only developers can navigate, a well-configured Sanity Studio gives content editors a tailored, intuitive environment. A verified G2 reviewer managing a municipal government website noted that content previously requiring a developer to touch the codebase is now fully managed by non-technical staff through Studio — with no manual deploys or cache headaches.5. Marketing teams gain meaningful autonomy Enterprise reviewers consistently cite reduced bottlenecks as the primary business outcome. One enterprise reviewer with 20+ years of CMS experience described it as the easiest CMS in their career, specifically because marketing teams gained the ability to create, edit, and publish content without queuing development tickets — accelerating campaign launches and cutting time-to-market on localized content.5 Reasons People Dislike Sanity1. Steep initial learning curve — especially for non-developers This is the most frequently cited complaint across G2 (60 mentions across "steep learning curve" and "challenging setup" categories), Reddit threads, and practitioner reviews. Setting up schemas, learning GROQ, and configuring Studio customizations requires genuine developer investment. Unlike WordPress or Webflow, there are no ready-made themes. Non-technical founders or small teams without dedicated developer support will struggle to get meaningful value without help.2. Documentation gaps on advanced use cases Several reviewers note that Sanity's documentation is strong for basics but thins out quickly on advanced patterns — custom Studio components, complex GROQ projections, AI Assist wiring, Content Releases workflows. Practitioners report piecing together answers from community posts, GitHub issues, and examples rather than official docs. Sanity has improved this noticeably since 2024, but the gap persists for edge cases.3. Costs can surprise at scale The free tier is genuinely generous. But several practitioners and the team at ContentWrap (who documented a 1,500+ document enterprise migration) flag that unexpected API usage, asset bandwidth, and dataset volume can push bills significantly above base plan expectations. The Growth plan runs $300+/month at volume. Teams migrating large Contentful or Webflow installs should model their API call volume before committing.4. No frontend included — requires a developer to get full value Sanity does not ship a frontend, and this is by design. But for teams expecting a traditional CMS experience where the website comes with the tool, this is a mismatch. One founder-reviewed account noted that unlike WordPress, there are no themes — everything visual requires a developer to build. This is only a problem if expectations are set incorrectly, but it surfaces repeatedly in mixed-technical-level reviews.5. Customization creates maintenance responsibility The same flexibility that makes Sanity powerful creates an ongoing obligation. Custom inputs, plugins, Studio configurations, and schema files live in your codebase and need to be maintained as Sanity evolves. A verified G2 reviewer flagged that basic features sometimes require custom implementation where other CMSes provide them out of the box — and those customizations become technical debt if the original developer moves on.What is Sanity CMS used for? Sanity markets itself as a Content Operating System — which is a useful frame. It is not just a CMS. It is Big infrastructure for structured content that can feed websites, apps, AI agents, IoT, and internal tools from a single Content Lake.The companies running Sanity in production include ubiqutous Anthropic, Shopify, Figma, PUMA, AT&T, Burger King, Spotify, National Geographic, and Unilever. They are not using it because it is easy to set up. They are using it because it is the most programmable content platform available.Content operations software: where Sanity fitsThe term content operations software describes platforms that manage the entire content lifecycle — creation, approval, publishing, distribution, and measurement — not just storage. Sanity has expanded from pure headless CMS into this space through several recent product additions:Sanity Studio is the editing environment. Fully customizable with React, it can be shaped to match any editorial workflow — from simple blog publishing to multi-stage legal review processes.Content Agent is Sanity's built-in AI assistant, allowing editors to generate, transform, and query content through natural language inside the Studio. Unlike third-party AI writing tools, it has direct access to your content graph.Content Releases manages scheduled, coordinated publishing across multiple documents — the equivalent of a "campaign" or "issue" workflow that was previously impossible in headless CMS without custom development.Sanity MCP Server is the integration point for AI development tools. Developers using Claude Code or Cursor can query and patch Sanity content directly from their coding environment — the first native MCP integration in the headless CMS market.Agent API (Agent Actions) allows programmatic content creation, transformation, and publishing through an API designed for AI agents rather than human editors. This is Sanity's forward bet on AI-generated and AI-maintained content at scale.Together these make Sanity the most complete content operations platform available to engineering teams in 2026 — not just a place to store content, but infrastructure for how content is created, reviewed, published, and consumed by both humans and machines.Why teams are switchingTeams typically migrate to Sanity from three starting points:What Customers DislikeWhat they are solving forWhat Sanity providesWordPress + YoastSEO tooling bolted onto a publishing toolSchema-native structured data, predictable metadataContentfulRigid field types, expensive at scaleFlexible document model, GROQ, no per-field pricingDrupal / AEMDeployment complexity, slow editorial workflowHosted Content Lake, real-time collaboration, portable textAny legacy CMSAI integration roadblocksSanity MCP Server for Claude and Cursor workflows, Agent APIThe Sanity MCP Server point deserves emphasis in 2026. Sanity is the only major headless CMS with a native MCP integration, meaning developers using Claude or Cursor can query, create, and patch content directly from their AI coding environment. For teams building AI-native content operations, this is a material advantage over every alternative.How to choose a Sanity development companyGeneric "things to look for in an agency" advice is useless. These eight criteria are specific to Sanity work and map directly to where projects fail.1. Official partner status — verify it yourselfCheck sanity.io/agency-partners. Sanity vets partners directly and the list changes. An agency that says they are a partner but does not appear in the directory either lost the status or never had it. Do not take their word for it.2. GROQ fluency, not just GraphQLAsk any shortlisted agency to send you a GROQ query from a recent project. If they send you GraphQL instead, or cannot explain why they chose GraphQL in a specific situation, their Sanity work is shallow. GROQ is the native query language. Developers who build entirely in GraphQL are translating rather than reasoning.3. Production schema examples with editorial UXAsk to see an anonymized schema.ts file from a comparable project. Red flags: field names that are snake_case technical jargon with no title or description properties set, no custom validation rules, no portable text configuration. This tells you whether they design schemas for developers or for editors.4. Custom Studio components — not just the defaultsLive preview, scheduled publishing, role-based access, custom input components, and AI Assist integration are not automatic. They require Studio engineering. Ask specifically what custom Studio components they have built and whether you can see a demo. Any agency that cannot show at least three custom Studio patterns has limited depth.5. Documented migration plan for your current CMSIf you are moving from WordPress, Contentful, Drupal, or AEM, ask for a written migration plan before signing. It should include: content inventory and mapping, transformation scripts, redirect strategy, parallel-run period, and a rollback plan. Agencies that quote migrations without a written plan will discover scope on your budget.6. Average project cost, not just a minimumA $10K minimum tells you almost nothing. Ask: "What is the average completed project cost for a project similar to ours, and what drove scope expansion on the last three you delivered?" The answer reveals budgeting discipline, not just price positioning.7. Named client references in your industryA list of logos is not a reference. Ask for a name and email of a client at a company of similar size in a similar industry, and call them. Ask: "What would you do differently if you hired them again?" Written references are diplomatic. Phone calls are honest.8. Post-launch warranty and retention rateAsk what percentage of clients re-engage them after launch. Below 70% means they ship and disappear. Ask what the warranty covers — bugs introduced by their code should be fixed at no charge for a defined period (30–90 days minimum). Get this in writing.14 best Sanity development companies in the world (2026)Average cost figures are marked as estimated, and based on comparable project descriptions and market rates. Published figures come from agency-stated minimums and ranges.1. FocusReactiveHQ: London · Amsterdam · Warsaw · Remote
Time zone: CET, strong US East overlap
Founded: 2019 · Team: 30+
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.9 / 5 (22+ verified reviews)
Average project cost: $15K–$60K (published range $10K–$49K; enterprise above)FocusReactive is the most consistently cited Sanity-specialist agency in third-party comparisons and is distinguished from general headless shops by holding four simultaneous CMS partnerships (Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload). This vendor-agnostic positioning is genuinely unusual — most agencies recommend what they know, not what fits. Their open-source output (Groqd, CMS-Kit) and conference organizing activity (JSNation, React Summit) signals technical depth that few agencies can match.Best for: Teams that have not decided on a CMS yet, B2B SaaS marketing sites, headless migrations from WordPress or Contentful, multi-locale enterprise builds, AI-native content workflows
Typical stack: Sanity + Next.js, Shopify + Sanity headless commerce
Limitations: Not the right fit for legacy PHP/Drupal custom work or Fortune 100 programs where headcount volume is the primary requirement2. Roboto StudioHQ: London, UK
Time zone: GMT
Founded: ~2019
Sanity partner status: Official Preferred Partner + Community Ambassador
Clutch rating: 5.0 (verified reviews)
Average project cost: £15K–£60K (starting from £15K published)Roboto Studio is one of the most active contributors to the Sanity open-source ecosystem — their sanity-plugin-media library is used across thousands of projects, which is the clearest external signal of how deeply they understand Sanity's internals. They are also authors of two official Sanity Learn courses on Next.js and creators of Turbo Start Sanity, their starter template used on every new build. Every developer on the team is Sanity-certified.Best for: Sanity-first builds, e-commerce Sanity + Shopify composable architectures, teams that want to upskill their own developers (they run Sanity workshops), AI-native Studio builds with Assist and Agent Actions
Typical stack: Sanity + Next.js exclusively
Limitations: Boutique capacity; not suited for large multi-team enterprise programs3. BejamasHQ: Remote-first (Poland-based, global team)
Time zone: CET
Founded: ~2018
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.9
Average project cost: $20K–$75K (estimated; minimum not published)Bejamas describes themselves as "composable web co-pilots" and the positioning is accurate. They are tech-agnostic (Sanity is one of several CMSes in their stack) but have strong Sanity delivery track record across 200+ projects. Their strength is performance — Core Web Vitals optimization, edge delivery, and Jamstack architecture — rather than editorial UX or schema design.Best for: Performance-critical websites, companies where Core Web Vitals matter for SEO or conversion, Jamstack migrations, companies of all sizes (startup to enterprise)
Typical stack: Sanity + Next.js / Astro + Vercel/Cloudflare edge
Limitations: Less specialized in editorial workflow depth than Sanity-first shops4. DEPT®HQ: Amsterdam, NL (30+ locations, 5 continents)
Time zone: Global
Founded: 2015
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.8
Average project cost: $100K–$500K+ (estimated; enterprise tier)DEPT® is the largest verified Sanity partner by headcount and is the right choice when Sanity is one component inside a global digital transformation that also involves engineering, brand, and marketing. Clients include Google, KFC, Philips, Fidelity, Twitch, and eBay. They are B Corp certified and Climate Neutral. Sanity is one of many platforms in their stack — this is not a Sanity-specialist shop.Best for: Global enterprises that need Sanity integrated into a multi-system digital platform with full brand, technology, and marketing support
Typical stack: Multi-platform; Sanity used as content layer within broader DXP
Limitations: Not the right fit for focused Sanity builds, SMBs, or teams that want dedicated Sanity expertise5. iO AgencyHQ: Belgium (Mechelen), NL, Sweden, Denmark, Bulgaria
Time zone: CET
Founded: 2005
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.9
Average project cost: $75K–$300K+ (estimated; enterprise positioning)iO is a full-service European agency: strategy, brand, content, marketing, and technology — where Sanity slots into a much larger digital transformation engagement. Their value is not Sanity depth but enterprise governance: compliance, multi-stakeholder delivery, and cross-country rollouts. The right choice for European enterprises and government bodies that need a single partner across disciplines.Best for: European enterprise digital transformation, government bodies, multi-country digital platforms
Limitations: Premium pricing; Sanity is one of many CMS options in their portfolio6. We Make WebsitesHQ: London · New York
Time zone: GMT / EST
Founded: 2008 (joined TechM XDS 2021)
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.8
Average project cost: $30K–$150K (estimated; minimum from $1K stated)One of the most experienced Shopify Plus agencies globally, with Sanity powering the content layer on headless storefronts. Their work targets premium DTC and B2B brands in fashion, beauty, and lifestyle. The TechM XDS backing provides enterprise stability. The limitation is scope: this is a Shopify-first agency — Sanity without Shopify is not their focus.Best for: Premium Shopify Plus + Sanity headless storefronts, DTC brands with global ambitions
Limitations: Not the right choice for non-commerce Sanity projects7. WebstacksHQ: San Diego, CA, USA
Time zone: PST
Founded: 2020
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $40K–$120K (estimated; minimum not published)Webstacks is verticalized in one segment. B2B SaaS marketing websites — and this focus is their primary advantage. They treat websites as products, not projects: ongoing iteration, design systems, and composable architecture rather than one-off builds. Notable work includes Calendly's marketing site redesign.Best for: Series B–pre-IPO B2B SaaS companies, AI/ML, FinTech, enterprise software
Limitations: Premium pricing; not a fit for e-commerce-first or small marketing sites8. CodalHQ: Chicago, IL · London · Bangalore
Time zone: CST + IST
Founded: 2009
Sanity partner status: Official
Clutch rating: 4.9
Average project cost: $50K–$200K (estimated)Codal is a full-service shop — design, strategy, dev, QA, and project management — which makes them a strong fit for mid-to-large enterprise projects that need a single partner to own the whole delivery. They work across retail, CPG, healthcare, and manufacturing. Sanity is one of several platforms in their portfolio.Best for: Mid-to-large enterprise with complex omnichannel content, full-service delivery needs
Limitations: Less Sanity-specialized than boutique shops9. MonogramHQ: Atlanta, GA, USA
Time zone: EST
Founded: ~2017
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $15K–$150K (range published)Monogram is the strongest pick for design-led composable builds where visual quality and editorial experience matter as much as the engineering. They work in Astro, Svelte, and Next.js — modern stack adoption that signals they are not defaulting to safe legacy choices. Notable for AI/dev-tools company websites and design-conscious brands.Best for: Design-conscious brands, scaling startups, composable e-commerce, dev-tools company sites
Limitations: Smaller team limits capacity for very large enterprise programs10. Nearform (formerly Formidable)HQ: Seattle, WA (also Denver, Phoenix, London, Toronto)
Time zone: PST + Global
Founded: 2013
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $50K–$300K (minimum $30K published)Nearform brings serious React engineering depth to Sanity — GROQ optimization at scale, ISR and edge rendering, React Native + Sanity systems. Their acquisition of Formidable (the open-source React specialists) gives them credibility on high-traffic performance work that most agencies cannot match. Notable past work contributed to a commerce platform with a $3.3B acquired valuation.Best for: High-traffic performance-critical applications, enterprise engineering, React Native
Limitations: Sanity is one tool of many; editorial UX depth is secondary to engineering11. Two Point OHQ: Belgium · Netherlands
Time zone: CET
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $60K–$200K (minimum ~$50K published)Two Point O is the specialist choice for mid-market and enterprise organizations building composable digital platforms with Sanity specifically. They focus on multi-brand content platforms, large-scale migrations, and custom Studio development. Their limitation is scale — boutique capacity means they are not suited for concurrent multi-team enterprise programs.Best for: Mid-market to enterprise composable platforms, multi-brand content infrastructure, large migrations
Limitations: Not for small sites or low-budget projects12. RepresentHQ: Oslo, Norway · London
Time zone: CET
Founded: ~2016
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: ~$27K–$100K+ (300K NOK minimum published, ~$27K USD)Represent is a senior-only boutique with Sanity-pioneer status. The Agency have been building production Sanity work since the platform's early days. Their focus is headless Shopify + Sanity for DTC and e-commerce brands in the Nordics and Silicon Valley, with a business-advisory approach that goes beyond pure development. Notable for AI-assisted content translation pipelines built inside Sanity Studio.Best for: Ambitious DTC and e-commerce brands, Nordics and Silicon Valley, complex content models, GPT-integrated Studio workflows
Limitations: Boutique capacity; not for non-commerce enterprise content systems13. 85SIXTYHQ: California, USA
Time zone: PST
Years in business: 16+
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $30K–$120K (estimated)85SIXTY is unusual in combining Sanity CMS development with CRO (conversion rate optimization) and analytics rigor. Most Sanity agencies are pure-development shops. 85SIXTY layers GA4, GTM, and Media Mix Modeling onto headless Shopify + Sanity builds, which is the right combination for scaling DTC brands focused on measurable revenue lift rather than just a fast website.Best for: Shopify Plus brands that want dev + CRO + analytics, scaling DTCs with international ambitions
Limitations: Shopify-anchored; not a generalist Sanity shop14. IkiusHQ: Scandinavia (Norway-based)
Time zone: CET
Sanity partner status: Official
Average project cost: $15K–$60K (estimated)Ikius is a modern web development studio specializing in Sanity headless CMS implementations. They work with businesses ranging from SMBs to enterprise clients and have particular strength in content-rich marketing sites and e-commerce integrations. Their Sanity expertise extends to both Studio customization and frontend development.Best for: European businesses needing Sanity headless CMS implementations, content-rich marketing sites
Limitations: Smaller public profile than the larger agencies on this listSanity development company comparison table (2026)
AgencyHQTime zoneTeamAverage project costBest use case
1FocusReactiveLondon / Amsterdam / WarsawCET30+$15K–$70KSanity, Storyblok, Payload, enterprise project, SaaS, AI / Machine Learning2Roboto StudioLondon, UKGMTBoutique$20K–$75KEcommerce projects, open source software3BejamasRemote (Poland)CET49$20K–$75KPerformance / Jamstack / Core Web Vitals4DEPT®AmsterdamGlobal4,000+$100K–$500K+Global enterprise DXP5iO AgencyBelgium / NLCET1,000+$75K–$300KEuropean enterprise transformation6We Make WebsitesLondon / NYGMT/EST50+$30K–$150KShopify Plus + Sanity headless commerce7WebstacksSan Diego, USPST~50$40K–$120KB2B SaaS marketing sites8CodalChicago, USCST+IST150+$50K–$200KEnterprise full-service9MonogramAtlanta, USEST20–30$15K–$150KDesign-led composable10NearformSeattle, USGlobal100+$50K–$300KHigh-performance React / enterprise eng11Two Point OBelgium / NLCET40+$60K–$200KMid-market enterprise Sanity platforms12RepresentOslo / LondonCETBoutique$27K–$100K+DTC e-commerce, Nordics / SV1385SIXTYCalifornia, USPSTMidsize$30K–$120KShopify + CRO + analytics14IkiusTurku, FinlandCETSmall$20K–$60KSanity headless, EU marketSanity Agency Main CaveatsA few honest caveats about the general approach to finding Sanity agency:Time zones are underrated. A senior Croatian, Belarusian, or Polish, or any remote European team you can talk to live for 4 hours a day will out-deliver a US Sanity developer that bills 3× and replies on Slack within a business day. Pick for overlap and convenience, not just postcode.Rankings move fast. Clutch ratings shift, agencies grow or shrink, partnerships start and end. Verify every data point before hiring — especially partner status on sanity.io/agency-partners. Specialization beats reputation for Sanity work. Any development company can generate hundreds of positive Google reviews or whatever, and these public directories should be checked twice before contacting for a Sanity project. The Sanity ecosystem (GROQ, Studio, schema patterns) and official partnership with engineering agencies around the world is deep enough that depth matters more than brand.Sanity developer rates (2026)Whether you are hiring a Sanity development company or an individual Sanity CMS developer, these are the current market rates:Engagement typeRate rangeNotesFreelance Sanity developer (Upwork$51-$75/hrSenior developers command $80–$120/hrBoutique Sanity agency (EU/UK)$80-$130/hrCET timezone, 4hr+ US overlapMid-size Sanity agency (US)$120-$200/hrHigher for senior-only teamsEnterprise agency (US)$150-$250/hrFull-service with PM and designCost-effective agency (India/EE)$35-$70/hrSanity-specific expertise variesMonthly retainer (boutique)$8K-$15K/monthOngoing iteration modelFixed project (marketing site)$15K-$50KSimple schema, standard frontendFixed project (enterprise migration)$50K-$200K+Complex schema, content transformationWhich Sanity CMS developer or agency should you hire?Use this decision logic before booking any intro calls:You have not chosen a CMS yet → FocusReactive (vendor-agnostic, holds Sanity + Storyblok + Contentful + Payload partnerships)Headless Shopify + Sanity, premium fashion or luxury brand → Commerce-UI or We Make WebsitesHeadless Shopify + Sanity, Nordic or EU DTC brand → RepresentHeadless Shopify + Sanity + CRO/analytics → 85SIXTYEnterprise content platform, European full-service → iO Agency or DEPT®Enterprise content platform, US full-service → Codal or NearformPerformance-critical React application → Bejamas B2B SaaS marketing site, US-based preference → Webstacks or Monogram (design-led)B2B SaaS marketing site, EU preference or async-friendly → FocusReactiveSanity-first, complex schema architecture → Roboto StudioMulti-brand, multi-locale content infrastructure → Two Point ODesign-led, editorial UX focus → Monogram Budget-constrained, need genuine Sanity expertise → IkiusHow to run the agency selection processStep 1: Write a one-page brief first. What you are building. Your current CMS. Content volume and type. Number of editors. Target launch date. Integrations (CRM, commerce, search). Budget range. Without this, every agency conversation will be exploratory rather than evaluative.Step 2: Shortlist three agencies from this list. Use the decision tree above. Do not contact more than four — you will waste your own time on calls that reveal nothing differential.Step 3: Send the same five questions to all three:Show me a Sanity schema.ts from a project similar to mine.How do you handle live preview, scheduled publishing, and role-based access?What is your migration plan for content from [current CMS]?What does your warranty cover and for how long after launch?Who specifically works on this project — names, seniority, and hourly rate?Step 4: Run a paid discovery before signing a full build. $2K–$5K for a one-week discovery produces a content model sketch, a migration risk register, and a detailed scope. It also tells you whether the team can think — and gives you a deliverable even if you walk away.Step 5: Reference-check by phone, not email. Ask former clients: "What would you do differently if you hired them again?" The answer is always more useful than "what did they do well."Step 6: Sign with fixed milestones and a kill clause. Time-and-materials with no milestones is where projects bleed indefinitely. Fixed milestones with an exit option at each one protect both sides.Conclusion: should you hire a freelance Sanity developer or an agency?This is the practical question that comes after every list — and it has a direct answer.Hire a freelance Sanity developer when: you have a small, well-defined scope (a schema audit, a custom Studio input, a GROQ optimization pass), a limited budget under $10K, and an in-house developer who can own the codebase long-term. Good freelancers on Upwork charge $51–$75/hr median ($80–$120 for senior specialists) and can deliver fast on contained tasks. The risk is single-point failure — if they go dark, your institutional knowledge goes with them.Hire a Sanity development agency when: the project involves content migration, multi-locale rollouts, custom editorial workflows, a headless commerce storefront, or any situation where the CMS needs to outlast the original developer. Agencies bring team coverage, documented schema decisions, post-launch warranties, and the ability to scale without rehiring. Their higher day rate typically produces a lower total cost of ownership over 18–24 months because they reduce the rebuild cycles that under-specified freelance work creates.The threshold where agencies win on pure economics is roughly a $20K+ project with ongoing editorial complexity. Below that, a strong freelancer with Sanity partner certification is often the better choice — provided you treat their engagement as time-limited and keep documentation requirements strict.One practical test: ask any candidate — freelancer or agency — to show you a schema.ts file from a production project and explain three design decisions they made in it. A freelancer who can answer that question fluently is worth more than an agency that cannot. The credential matters less than the reasoning.The question is which one matches your project type, budget, and timezone — which is what the decision tree above is for.Final noteChoosing the right Sanity CMS agency or development team comes down to real expertise, proven experience, and actual websites launched, not just a polished portfolio. Maintainability matters more than most teams will tell you: you won't always have developers and marketing aligned post-launch, so initial support is critical to help your content team set up the right processes from day one.SEO capabilities are a given, but in 2025–2026, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) has become a meaningful differentiator — look for teams that understand how to structure content for AI-driven search, not just traditional ranking signals. Daily progress updates keep you in control and eliminate surprises, and flexible revisions ensure the final build actually matches your requirements.Most importantly, work with a dedicated team and official Sanity implementor that has a clear project coordinator, not a fragmented setup where accountability gets lost. The difference between a smooth launch and a painful one usually comes down to that single point of contact.Frequently asked questionsIs Sanity CMS free?
Yes, the free tier includes Sanity Studio, the hosted Content Lake APIs, and real-time collaborative editing — enough for solo developers, small sites, and prototypes. Paid plans (Growth, Enterprise) add higher API quotas, SSO, advanced roles, audit logs, and dedicated support. Free to start, paid as you scale. What is GROQ?
GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) is Sanity's native query language. It is designed specifically for querying document graphs with deeply nested references — more expressive than GraphQL for content-heavy applications. GROQ fluency is the clearest technical differentiator between Sanity specialists and general headless CMS developers.What is Sanity Studio?
Sanity Studio is an open-source, React-based editing environment that runs in the browser. Unlike fixed-UI CMSes, every aspect of Studio can be customized — field inputs, navigation structure, live preview, AI integrations, validation rules, and workflows. Studios are typically deployed to a subdomain (studio.yourdomain.com) and built as part of the project codebase.What is the Sanity Content Lake?
The Content Lake is Sanity's hosted data layer — the cloud database that stores all your content. It is queried via GROQ or GraphQL from any frontend. Unlike self-hosted CMSes, you do not manage the database. Sanity manages replication, backups, and CDN delivery. The Live CDN ensures real-time content delivery globally.How long does a Sanity implementation take?
A standard marketing site with a well-defined schema takes 6-10 weeks from kick-off to launch. A headless e-commerce storefront with Shopify integration typically takes 10–16 weeks. An enterprise migration from Drupal or AEM with content transformation takes 16–24 weeks or more depending on content volume and integration complexity.Sources: sanity.io/agency-partners (June 2026), clutch.co/web-developers/sanity (June 2026), agency-published case studies and pricing pages, Sanity product documentation, Crunchbase, TechCrunch, Agency websites, and Google search. Cost figures marked "estimated" are based on comparable project scope and market rate data — verify directly with each agency.

TL;DR: CMS Migration Numbers That Tell the StoryMost website migrations fail the same way: rankings drop, traffic disappears, and recovery takes months. The teams that avoid it don't get lucky — they treat CMS migration services as an engineering discipline, not a one-time technical event. The difference between a migration that compounds into growth and one that unravels six months post-launch comes down to how early SEO planning enters the process.The headless CMS market reached $816M in 2024 and is growing 22% annually, with 73% of enterprises already adopting headless architecture. As more companies move to API-first stacks, choosing the right CMS migration service is critical to:Preserve search rankings with proper redirects and URL mappingImprove performance and Core Web VitalsEnable faster content workflows with headless CMSReduce long-term CMS costs and vendor lock-inThis guide reviews the best CMS migration service providers in 2026 to help you migrate safely — without traffic loss or technical debt.Migrate a Website-Growing TrendAnalysts now expect the majority of digital teams to move away from page-based suites toward composable, API-first stacks in the next 2-3 years. As brands add channels, markets, and campaigns, traditional CMS workflows start to crack: content is duplicated per site, templates are hard to change, and every new experiment needs a developer. Headless CMS flips that: content lives in one structured hub, feeds every channel via APIs, and lets editors ship updates without queuing behind the sprint board. When teams rush into a headless CMS migration without SEO planning, they don’t just change platforms; they wipe out the very signals search engines use to trust and rank their sites.What Is Headless CMS Migration? Migrating a website to a headless CMS means decoupling your content from how it's presented. s work in one central content hub. Developers build fast, flexible frontends in Next.js, React, or whatever the delivery layer demands for any channel: web, app, or in-product UI. The content model stays stable. The presentation layer becomes a technical decision, not a CMS constraint.That separation is the point. It's also where migrations get complicated.Your SEO won't migrate automatically. Rankings follow decisions — specifically, the ones you make before anything moves. Keep URLs as stable as possible. Build a complete 301 redirect map for every URL that changes. Crawl both the old and new versions of the site before launch to catch missing metadata, lost content, broken internal links, and orphaned pages. That decision compounds: a redirect missed at migration can take months to recover from in search.The architecture is the easy part to get excited about. The unglamorous audit work is what protects everything you've already earned.Why Go Headless? CMS Migration JustificationWhat pushes businesses to CMS migration besides the draconian price of your Contentful? Let me guess, the code quality? Security reasons? It depends.That's exactly what professional headless CMS migration services are designed to solve — handling the technical and SEO complexity so your team doesn't have to.Here are the top 9 reasons businesses seek headless CMS migration services, starting with economic ones and followed by technical website reasons:Escape runaway license costs: Legacy and monolithic CMS platforms keep increasing base subscription fees. Ballooning costs, driven by user-seat pricing and add-on charges, are turning your content stack into a fixed cost that grows faster than your traffic or revenue. This erodes ROI over time and makes staying on your current CMS increasingly hard to justify.Stop paying for “empty” overages: Many enterprise CMS contracts charge extra for API calls, environments, locales, or storage, even if you’re not using advanced features that justify the bill.Replace complex pricing with predictable value: Moving to a modern headless stack lets you choose components (CMS, hosting, search, media) that match your actual usage and budget, instead of being locked into one vendor’s bundled pricing.Reinvest license spend into growth: The money currently tied up in inflated CMS subscriptions can be redirected into content production, SEO, and experimentation that measurably drives revenue.”Future‑proof against price hikes: A composable headless architecture gives you leverage; if one vendor’s pricing becomes unreasonable, you can swap it out without rebuilding your entire site.Security vulnerabilities: Traditional monolithic CMS platforms like WordPress (when unmanaged) or aging proprietary systems are prime targets for hackers. Outdated plugins, unpatched cores, and shared databases create attack surfaces that headless, API-first architectures simply don't have.Poor performance: A slow website is a leaking revenue pipe. If your CMS is tightly coupled to your frontend, every design tweak becomes a developer ticket. Businesses migrate to gain speed, better Core Web Vitals scores, and the freedom to optimize independently.Technical debt: Years of patched plugins, custom workarounds, and legacy integrations quietly accumulate until your codebase becomes a house of cards. A full site migration is often the cleanest escape route.Lack of scalability: When your CMS can't handle traffic spikes, multiple languages, or omnichannel delivery without expensive custom work, growth itself becomes the enemy. Modern headless platforms are built to scale without breaking.The Moment Teams Start Looking for a Website Migration AgencyMost teams don't reach out to website migration companies because the technology stopped working. They migrate because the cost of staying finally outweighed the cost of moving. The CMS that made sense three years ago — reasonable at the time, familiar to the team, integrated into the workflow — quietly becomes the thing that slows every campaign, blocks every experiment, and shows up as a line item that's hard to justify at budget review.The shift is rarely dramatic. It's the accumulation of small frictions: a developer ticket for a content change that should take thirty seconds, a performance audit that points back to the platform, a pricing renewal that arrives with a number that no longer matches the value. At some point the question changes from "should we migrate?" to "what were we waiting for?"That's when the search for website migration companies begins — not in crisis, but past the point where staying is the safer option.The world of content systems has changed, just like you after Covid. While platforms like Storyblok are popular among marketers for visual editing, the best CMS depends on your team structure, developer resources, and content complexity. Alternatives like Contentful, Sanity, and Strapi may be better suited depending on the use case. We advise Storyblok for its simplicity, as it's the CMS that consistently gets the least pushback from the people who actually use it daily.

How do you move a site without significant SEO loss, and who can assist my team with CMS migration services?What should be taken into account before CMS migration?One of the most critical decisions, besides choosing website migration company, is choosing the right CMS, and for most businesses today, that means going headless. But raw headless power alone isn't enough; consider the following:CMS Flexibility: When you migrate a website, whether from a legacy platform or decide to migrate a WordPress website to a more scalable architecture, clients increasingly demand a CMS that supports diverse, flexible layouts for individual content types. Think distinct page structures for blog posts, case studies, landing pages, and product pages, all managed from a single platform without duplicating effort.Friendliness: The days of requiring a developer to publish a paragraph or rearrange a section are over. The best modern CMS platforms integrate a visual page builder directly into the interface, empowering marketing and content teams to construct, update, and iterate on pages entirely independently — a capability that WordPress alone, in its traditional form, often struggles to deliver at scale.SEO Preservation: A poorly executed migration can wipe out years of hard-earned organic rankings overnight. Careful URL mapping, redirect management, and metadata migration are just as important as the technical build itself — and should never be an afterthought.Localisation Support: For any business operating across borders, localization is no longer a nice-to-have. The ability to manage multiple languages, regional content variations, and locale-specific SEO from within the same CMS is now a baseline expectation, not a premium feature.Get these four right, and your website migration becomes a launchpad; get them wrong, and it becomes a liability.SEO Preservation: The Part That's Easy to Get WrongWebsite migration impacts SEO reasonably. Every page you've ranked took time. Every backlink pointing at a specific URL is a signal you've earned. When you migrate a website, that equity doesn't transfer automatically; it follows the decisions you make before a single line of code changes.The analogy is here: fixing SEO after a website migration is like correcting old handpoke tattoos done by an amateur. You can do it, but you're always working against what's already there. The cleaner move is to plan and protect everything upfront.That means treating SEO preservation as an engineering problem, not an afterthought.Before any migration begins, a serious team runs a full technical audit: title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and image alt text – and documents every URL in the existing site. Not most of them. Every single one. From there, a complete 301 redirect map is built, mapping each old URL to its new destination. Nothing gets left to assumptions.CMS Migration ChecklistThe pre-migration checklist that compounds into your post-launch performance:Full technical audit of the existing siteComplete URL inventory301 redirect map (old URL → new URL)Analytics baseline exportInternal linking structure documentationCurrent ranking data exportSchema markup documentationFull site backup before anything movesMiss one of these, and you're not migrating a website (CMS); you're rebuilding your search visibility from scratch. The development agencies that get this right treat the checklist above as the floor, not the ceiling.
The post-launch CMS migration checklist:Organic traffic monitoring via GA4 and Google Search Console from day one. Ahrefs if you want a second signal.Crawl error checks in the first 48 hours — redirect failures and orphaned pages surface fast if you're watching.Ranking position tracking — flag significant drops in the first two weeks. The faster you catch them, the less they compound.Metadata review in the first month — rewrite underperforming title tags and descriptions while the index is still settling.Index coverage report — confirm priority pages are being crawled and indexed correctly.This combo of technical care and content parity lets you migrate a website to a headless content management system for performance without sacrificing your past merits.Replatforming vs. Migration. Why ''just replatforming' is Not Enough“Just replatforming” is not enough because it moves your site to new tech without accurately fixing the underlying problems in content, workflows, data, and SEO. If you simply swap CMS platforms or hosting and keep the same messy content model, fragmented data, and ad‑hoc processes, you end up with the same bottlenecks. The difference is that only now they’re running on a newer, more expensive stack. A meaningful website migration is an opportunity to rethink information architecture, streamline content types and workflows, clean and normalise data, and plan SEO and analytics from the start so your team actually ships faster and your site performs better instead of “lifting and shifting” old issues into a shiny new interface.How Long Does it Take to Migrate a Website?Migrating a website is rarely a one-size-fits-all process. Migration timelines vary widely depending on the size, complexity, and condition of your existing setup. A simple CMS migration for a small site might take as little as two to four weeks, while a full global website migration involving thousands of pages, multiple languages, and complex integrations can take anywhere from three to six months. Headless CMS Migration Process and PlanningWhen you move a website from a legacy platform to a headless CMS solution, the bulk of the time goes into content mapping, URL redirects, SEO preservation, and quality assurance, not just the technical build. For instance, WordPress migrations tend to be faster thanks to a mature ecosystem of tools, but enterprise-scale projects demand far more planning. Working with a professional CMS migration service can really make a difference. Website migration team have established workflows that help lower risks, safuguard your search rankings, and minimize downtime. No matter if you need basic website migration services for a small business or a complicated content overhaul across different region for enterprise business, the key principle remains unchanged:The more thorough your plan for a migration, the smoother it will be.Top 11 Website CMS Migration Services to Future-Proof Your WebsiteHere's a list of headless CMS migration services that cater to different business needs, covering everything from consulting and maintenance to migrating custom features and integrating AI.1. FocusReactive (London, Amsterdam, Warsaw)





FocusReactive is a full-service headless CMS agency. The engineering company builds high-performance AI-powered marketing sites and web applications on Next.js and modern headless CMS platforms: Sanity, Payload, Storyblok, and Directus. Headquartered in London, with a Warsaw office and a distributed remote team, they work with clients across the UK, Europe, United States, Australia and beyond who have outgrown their current stack and need a website migration done without SEO loss, editorial disruption, or technical debt carried forward. ProsDeep specialisation in headless, composable architectures and website migrations from legacy or expensive SaaS CMS to open-source headless stacks.Strong engineering plus an SEO/performance mindset, including content modelling, redirects, and Core Web Vitals-friendly frontends.Dedicated enterprise migration consultancy. FocusReactive conducts a full pre-migration audit covering content architecture, SEO risk mapping, and platform fit, giving enterprise teams a clear site migration roadmap and eliminating the costly surprises that derail large-scale enterprise website CMS migration projectsConsStrategy involvement means higher project minimums than basic lift‑and‑shift vendors.PricingEarly-stage/mid-market SaaS marketing site headless migration: ~40k–130k+ USD depending on size, redesign, and integrations.2. Tribe Digital (London)Tribe Digital is a digital product company that helps startups, scale-ups, and enterprises build human-centred websites and digital products. They are not only migration agency, but also create brand strategy, UX/UI design, and full-cycle app development. They partner with visionary brands to craft best-in-class digital experiences that are as commercially driven as they are beautifully designed.ProsSaaS and B2B website migration practice with SEO and performance as explicit goals.Good fit for product-led companies moving to a modern stack (often headless) with emphasis on UX and growth.ConsLikely overkill for small, non-technical sites.No public pricing; full scoping and proposal cycle required.PricingTypical SaaS marketing site replatforming: ~20k–80k+ USD.3. Tinloof (Berlin, Germany)





Tinloof is a design and development studio founded in 2019, specialising in frontend development and CMS migration services. The agency primarily serves SaaS, technology, and eCommerce brands planning a migration to modern headless CMS architecture. As one of Sanity's first official agency partners, their core CMS migration stack centres on Sanity CMS, Shopify, and TypeScript.Strengths
Strong fit for eCommerce brands planning a headless Shopify migration combined with a Sanity CMS migration — with demonstrated experience merging content and commerce layers into a unified headless platform without disrupting SEO performance.Design-led migration delivery with Core Web Vitals, technical SEO, and structured data treated as core migration deliverables, ensuring search visibility is maintained throughout the migration process.ConsSmall team (2–10 employees) — capacity constraints are a real consideration for larger enterprise CMS migration projects or time-sensitive migration timelinesLimited public evidence of large-scale multi-region or multi-language CMS migration projects, which may be a concern for global migration briefsPricingHeadless CMS migration services are priced at approximately $70–$150/hour based on public data.Fixed-price CMS migration projects are available for well-scoped briefs. Mid-complexity headless CMS migrations typically range from $20,000–$60,0004. Riotters (Szczecin, Poland)





Riotters is a Polish design studio and digital product agency positioning itself as a "design accelerator" for startups. Their work spans UX/UI design, product design, branding, motion design, and software development: with Payload CMS, HubSpot, and low/no-code tools listed as their primary development stack. They work across Europe and the Americas with a flat-structure, senior-led team model. Although this is not a primary CMS migration service, their design development skils shouldn't be underrated.ProsA strong design execution, guided by a structured and process-driven approach, is ideal for brands that require visual quality and in-depth user experience, along with content management system implementation.Payload CMS development listed as a core service, making them a viable option for projects where the CMS and application layer need to share a codebase.Active Dribbble presence with documented portfolio — useful for evaluating design quality before engaging.ConsDesign-led rather than engineering-led — projects where content architecture, migration methodology, and technical SEO are the primary concerns may be outside their core strengthNo public pricing and limited evidence of large-scale CMS migrations in their public case studiesPricingClutch reviews indicate project budgets ranging from under $10,000 to over $1.4 million. No standard rates published publicly5. Blazity (Warsaw, Poland)






Blazity is a  boutique agency with a Next.js focus and headless CMS migration listed among their services. Their most referenced case study involves migrating 15 WordPress sites to Contentful — a technically solid project, though one that reflects their platform preferences more than broad migration versatility.Their stack is intentionally narrow: JavaScript, Contentful, and Hygraph. That focus works well when those are already the chosen tools. If your migration involves a different CMS, a mixed stack, or platforms like Sanity, Storyblok, or Payload, the fit becomes less clear. Similarly, their boutique size means capacity is a real variable for larger or time-sensitive projects.A reasonable choice for scoped Contentful work. Less so for teams that need platform flexibility or broader migration coverage.ProsSEO preservation during migrations — full URL mapping, redirect handling, and structured data migration includedConsBoutique agency size means capacity may be limited for very large concurrent projectsMainly work with JavaScript; this agency is not a fit if your project requires a different tech stack such as PHP, Ruby, or a legacy CMSCMS platform coverage is narrower than generalist agencies — strongest with Contentful and HygraphPricingBlazity does not publish fixed pricing publicly. Rates are consistent with a senior-level European boutique agency. A discovery call is required to get a tailored estimate.6. SUNZINET digital agency (Cologne, Germany)Sunzinet is a development company from Germany. Their team is a strong fit for large-scale projects where you need a single agency to handle strategy, architecture, CMS integration, and marketing end-to-end.ProsTeam across 3 countries, serving major clients like Bosch, Siemens, Canon, Bayer, and Swarovski Optik Full-service under one roof: strategy, CRM, CMS migration, marketing, and automationConsNot suited for smaller teams or simpler projectsNo transparent pricing; requires a consultation to get a quotePricing Hourly rates are approximately $70-$150/hr (TechBehemoths), which puts them in the mid-to-premium range. They're geared toward enterprise budgets; smaller projects are likely not a good fit.7. Five Jars (New York, USA)Five Jars is a Virginia-based full-service web design and development agency that has been delivering digital solutions since 2016, specialising in CMS-based platform builds, migrations, and long-term technical support for nonprofits, arts and culture institutions, healthcare, and enterprise clients. As a certified Drupal partner with expertise across Drupal, WordPress, and headless CMS platforms, they combine strategy, UX/UI design, and engineering to build accessible, scalable digital experiences.ProsStrong track record with mission-driven and nonprofit organisations, including large YMCAs, NGOs, and cultural institutions across the US.Full-cycle service from strategy and design to development, integrations, and post-launch support — no need to juggle multiple vendors.ConsLess focused on pure headless or composable CMS setups; better suited to teams who need a trusted generalist partner than those pursuing cutting-edge Jamstack architectures.PricingCMS build or migration for mid-size sites: ~$25,000–$150,000+ USD depending on scope, integrations, and content volume.8. BitsOrchestra (Lviv, Ukraine)Bits Orchestra is a US/Europe-based web and mobile development agency founded in 2015, specialising in CMS migrations, headless CMS development, and platform modernisation for mid-size to enterprise clients across manufacturing, retail, education, and nonprofits. As a certified Kentico Bronze Partner with deep expertise in Umbraco, Contentful, Sanity, and Strapi, they are particularly known for complex legacy CMS transitions with near-zero downtime.ProsDeep specialisation in .NET-based CMS platforms (Kentico, Umbraco) and complex enterprise migrations — a strong choice when risk control and zero downtime are non-negotiable.Proven SEO-safe migration process, preserving URLs, metadata, and sitemaps with 301 mapping to protect rankings.ConsLess relevant for teams on non-.NET stacks or those looking for a lightweight, fast-turnaround headless build without complex legacy systems involved.PricingSimple CMS migrations: from ~$5,000–$15,000 USD; large-scale or enterprise migrations range significantly higher based on complexity, integrations, and content volume.9. 9thCO (Toronto, Canada)9thCO is a Toronto-based digital company that has been building cutting-edge web platforms since 2013, specialising in headless CMS development, implementation, and migration for brands across finance, retail, and B2B. As official Storyblok, Strapi, and Netlify partners, they bring deep serverless architecture expertise to deliver secure, future-ready content solutions.ProsSpecialises in headless CMS implementations and migrations (e.g., Storyblok and Strapi), with a focus on preserving SEO and performance.Good choice if you’ve already picked a headless platform and need a migration team.ConsLess relevant if you plan to stay on fully traditional platforms.Pricing Headless CMS build + migration for mid‑size sites: ~40k–150k+ USD.10. WeFrameTech (India)
WeFrameTech is a headless commerce and development company with a strong focus on migration from legacy and monolithic platforms to modern headless architectures like Strapi, Directus, and custom JAMstack setups.WeFrameTech provides structured migration strategies, content modelling redesign, API planning, and frontend alignment to ensure a smooth transition from legacy CMS to scalable headless architecture.ProsWorks across 10+ platforms including Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, Prismic, and Builder.io.Offers 10–20 hours of free development as a risk-free startConsPricing is not publicly listed — requires a discovery call to get a quotePrimarily commerce-focused, so pure content-driven CMS migrations may not be their strongest suitLimited publicly verifiable case studies for non-ecommerce projectsPricingWeFrameTech does not publish fixed pricing. Based on their published guidance, a full headless migration project — including analysis, development, and data migration — can range from $50,000 to $150,000, depending on project scope and complexity. They offer a free initial consultation and a no-commitment trial period of free development hours for new clients.11. Cocoon Agency (UK-based, remote team)
Cocoon agency is a company around headless, composable architecture, and MACH. Their pitch is digital transformation for organizations moving off legacy platforms. Engineering and UX under one roof.The overlap is real. Where they differ: Cocoon speaks in architecture abstractions — "composable ecosystems," "omnichannel delivery," "API-first decoupling." The language signals ambition but not specificity. How to Choose the Right CMS Migration ServicesNot every agency that calls itself a CMS migration partner/provider is built for the same problem. Before you shortlist anyone, check these five things:Technical stack expertise: do they know the platform you're moving to, or are they learning on your project?E-commerce experience: product data, payments, and checkout flows don't survive a careless lift-and-shiftCMS specialists vs. generic dev shops: specialists know what breaks, what compounds, and what to protectSEO-safe methodology: redirects, canonicals, ranking preservation — this should be a defined process, not improvised per projectPost-launch support: what happens at week three when something misfires? The answer tells you more than the proposal doesHeadless CMS Agencies QuickpickThis list is very general, as there is no single winner or 'best' CMS service/agency across all scenarious. Everything depends on your site architecture, team structure, and risks around SEO. With that in mind, choose:

AgencyBest ForTimezoneTech Stack / CMS FocusSEO Migration StrengthProject Size FitPricing RangeNot a Fit If
FocusReactiveSEO-safe, high-performance migrationsGMT / CET (London + Warsaw)Next.js, Sanity, Storyblok, Payload, Contentful⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strong (redirects, CWV, architecture)Mid-market → Enterprise$40k–$130k+You need a cheap or quick lift-and-shiftTribe DigitalSaaS & product-led companiesGMT (London)Modern headless, UX-focused builds⭐⭐⭐⭐ StrongMid-market$20k–$80k+You only need backend migration (no UX work)TinloofHeadless commerce (Shopify + CMS)CET (Berlin)Sanity, Next.js, Shopify⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strong (esp. eCommerce SEO)Small → Mid$20k–$60kYou need multi-CMS flexibility or enterprise scaleRiottersDesign-heavy projectsCET (Szczecin, Poland)Payload CMS, HubSpot, low-code⭐⭐⭐ ModerateSmall → MidVaries widelySEO or migration complexity is your main concernBlazityContentful-based migrationsCET (Warsaw)Contentful, Hygraph⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strong (structured migrations)Mid-marketNot publicYou want CMS-agnostic expertiseFiveJarsFull-cycle CMS builds & migrations
EST (Arlington, VA / New York)Drupal, Wordpress⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strong (content-heavy SEO)Nonprofits, Mid-market & Enterprise$25k–$150k+You need an agency for accessible, mission-driven web platformsSUNZINETEnterprise digital transformationCET (Cologne)Full-stack (CMS + CRM + marketing)⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strong (enterprise SEO processes)Enterprise$70–$150/hrYou’re a startup or need lean executionBitsOrchestraDesign-led migrationsEST/CET (US & Europe)
Kentico, Umbraco, Contentful, Strapi⭐⭐⭐ ModerateMid → Enterprise
$20–$150kYou need zero-downtime migration from complex .NET or legacy CMS systems9thCOPlatform-specific migrationsEST (Toronto)Strapi, Netlify⭐⭐⭐⭐ StrongMid → Enterprise$40k–$150k+You’re staying on traditional CMSWeFrameTechHeadless commerce & multi-platformIST (India)Strapi, Sanity, Directus, JAMstack⭐⭐⭐ ModerateMid-market$50k–$150kYou need strong non-commerce case studiesCocoon AgencyMACH / composable architectureGMT (UK, Remote)API-first, composable stacks⭐⭐⭐ ModerateEnterpriseNot publicYou want concrete, execution-focused deliveryReady to Start Your CMS-to-CMS Migration?The most important voice in any website migration isn't your dev team's. It's the marketing operations team, the people who'll live in this system daily. Pick a platform and a partner that works for them first. The right fit depends on your workflow, not ours.

If you're planning a migration or specifically looking for a headless CMS agency, talk to CMS migration services team. Here you can also book an SEO-safe migration audit. We'll map out exactly what needs protecting before anything moves. CMS Migration Service FAQWhat happens when you migrate a website?When you run a website migration, you move key elements like domain, CMS platform, URL structure, design, and content from one setup to another. If it’s not planned properly, this can temporarily affect organic traffic, rankings, and tracking while search engines discover and re‑evaluate your new pages.Is SEO migration necessary?Yes, SEO‑led website migration services are essential if you want to keep your existing visibility, rankings, and revenue. Without structured SEO migration work (redirect mapping, content parity, technical checks), you risk broken URLs, lost authority, indexation issues, and significant drops in traffic.Can I migrate from WordPress to a headless CMS without traffic loss? You can migrate a WordPress website to a headless CMS with minimal or no lasting traffic loss if you treat it as a full SEO website migration project. That means preserving high‑value URLs where possible, implementing page‑level 301 redirects, maintaining or improving content, and launching on a fast, SEO‑friendly front end.Do I need e-commerce CMS migration services for Shopify/BigCommerce?If you are moving an e-commerce shopfront on Shopify or BigCommerce to a headless architecture, we recommend e-commerce CMS migration services. They help you migrate product data, content, URLs, and SEO signals correctly so you can benefit from faster headless experiences without sacrificing organic traffic or conversion rates.What headless CMS is the best for a marketing team with limited dev support?Storyblok is the best CMS here, for pure editorial independence out of the box. Its visual page builder lets non-technical teams build and publish pages without a developer in the loop.

Choosing the best Next.js agency is one of the highest-leverage decisions a SaaS founder or enterprise engineering lead can make. Regardless of the type of project you plan to undertake an agency, be it a small startup, mid-market SaaS, or a large enterprise, Next.js is your sensible choice for the frontend in 2026.This guide evaluates 15 Next.js development agencies across Europe, covering technical depth, verified CMS partnerships, Vercel platform experience, and documented client outcomes — so you can identify the right Next.js developers for your specific project without relying on rankings that prioritise brand size over delivery evidence.According to the State of JavaScript 2025 survey (13,000+ respondents, sponsored by Google Chrome and JetBrains), Next.js is used by 59% of JavaScript developers, making it the most adopted React meta-framework by a significant margin. Not every agency that lists Next.js development services on their website has built production-grade SaaS platforms with it. This guide focuses on European Next.js agencies with documented delivery at scale.Many well-known companies use Next.js for various purposes, e.g., Nike, Stripe, TikTok, Uber, Wayfair, Notion, and Apple. Thanks to its performance, scalability, and developer experience Next.js works well for enterprise websites, SaaS dashboards, and high-traffic landing pages. It’s also popular for e-commerce platforms, marketing sites, and customer-facing web apps.TL;DR: Top Next.js Agencies to Hire Worldwide Best Next.js agency for comprehensive Next.js development services: FocusReactive — engineering Next.js development agency, official partner of Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload CMS, strategic experts in headless CMS migrations from legacy platforms to headless architecture; 35-domain multilingual delivery for EasyPark, clients all over the worldBest for performance engineering and App Router migrations: Blazity —  70% LCP improvement for CookUnityBest for large enterprise digital transformation: Dept Agency; Contentful partnerBest for net-new SaaS product builds: Netguru or Boldare; full design-to-engineering lifecycle, strong Clutch track recordBest for custom B2B/B2C commerce platforms: Rigby; Medusa.js specialists for marketplace and multi-tenant buildsBest for ecommerce: Maker's Den, FocusReactive Next.js CMS AgencyBest for design-led SMB and startup builds: Halo Lab; competitive rates, high design qualityKey buying signals to verify before committing to any Next.js development agency: App Router in production (not Pages Router), named Vercel partner status, at least one case study with a measured outcome, and a defined post-launch SLA.Who This Guide Is ForThis guide is designed for marketing leaders, technically skilled CMOs, and decision-makers—CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and hands-on founders at mid-market SaaS companies and enterprise digital teams evaluating a Next.js development agency for upcoming projects.Migrating a legacy platform (WordPress, Webflow, Drupal, AEM) to a headless Next.js architectureBuilding a new SaaS frontend or Next.js website from scratch on the App RouterScaling an existing Next.js codebase that has outgrown the original team's capacityIf you are a marketing director selecting a Webflow agency, or an enterprise procurement team seeking a 500-person outsourcing firm, this selection guide is not the right resource. The Next.js agencies listed here are specialist software engineering teams, not general digital agencies, and the evaluation criteria reflect that difference.How to Evaluate a Next.js Development Agency: 8 CriteriaThese criteria should be applied before reviewing any Next.js agency's portfolio. Outline your project needs for each criterion, then score the agencies based on your requirements — not against each other in the abstract.1. Next.js App Router and React Server Component FluencyAny Next.js agency doing serious work in 2026 should be building on the App Router by default — it is the current production standard and the only model Vercel is actively developing new features for. An agency still defaulting to the Pages Router for new projects, or that cannot clearly explain the Client/Server Component boundary, is working on a deprecated paradigm.Ask your agency: Are your current production projects on the App Router or Pages Router? How do you decide which components are Server Components versus Client Components?Red flag: Defaults to "use client" on most components, or describes App Router as "still evaluating."2. Next.js Rendering Strategy DepthA capable Next.js agency should be able to tell you exactly which rendering strategy — SSG, ISR, SSR, or RSC — applies to each layer of your application and why, including the caching and cost implications of each choice. If the answer is "we use SSR for everything," that is not a strategy, it is a default.Ask your agency: How do you decide between SSG, ISR, and dynamic rendering in an App Router project? How do you handle cache invalidation when CMS content updates?Red flag: Cannot explain the difference between route-level and component-level caching in the App Router.3. Vercel Platform DepthProduction Next.js deployment on Vercel goes well beyond connecting a GitHub repo — it requires managing edge middleware, environment variable scoping, preview deployments, build cost optimisation, and observability tooling. An agency that has only used Vercel's free tier has not encountered the challenges enterprise deployments surface.Ask your agency: Have you managed Vercel enterprise accounts with multiple deployment targets? Have you configured Edge Middleware for geo-routing or A/B testing?Red flag: Cannot describe how they manage Vercel build costs or have never used Speed Insights for production diagnostics.4. Headless CMS Integration as Part of Next.js Development ServicesDeep CMS integration means designing the content model, configuring draft mode for live preview with React Server Components, and ensuring editors can operate independently after handover — not just connecting the API and fetching data. Ask for a certified partnership and a concrete content modelling example, not a list of supported platforms.Ask your agency: Are you a certified partner of the CMS we are considering? How do you implement draft mode with Server Components for live preview?Red flag: Treats CMS setup as a configuration task with no content modelling methodology to show.5. SEO Continuity and Core Web Vitals MethodologyFor platform migrations, organic search equity is a business asset that can be destroyed by poor redirect handling or metadata loss. A qualified Next.js agency treats Core Web Vitals and URL continuity as engineering deliverables from sprint one, not as post-launch cleanup.Ask: How do you handle URL mapping and redirect implementation during a migration? Can you show pre/post Core Web Vitals benchmarks from a previous project?Red flag: Redirects are handled at the end of the project, or the agency cannot produce crawl comparisons from past migrations.6. TypeScript and Code Quality: What to Expect from Senior Next.js DevelopersThe codebase a Next.js agency delivers will be maintained by your internal team or a future agency — TypeScript by default, automated tests, and clear documentation are baseline requirements, not premium extras.Ask your agency: Is TypeScript the default on all projects? What testing framework and coverage standards do your Next.js developers apply?Red flag: Delivers JavaScript-only codebases or has no automated testing in the handover.
ask the programmer meme7. Post-Launch Support and SLA StructureThe first 90 days after launch consistently surface redirect gaps, content model edge cases, and performance regressions. A Next.js agency without a formal post-launch support period and documented SLAs will deprioritise incidents because those hours are unscoped and unbillable.Ask your agency: What are your SLAs for critical production bugs in the first 90 days? Is a retainer model available for ongoing work?Red flag: No formal post-launch support structure beyond "reach out if something breaks."8. Enterprise Delivery EvidencePortfolio logos are not delivery evidence — ask for case studies that name a client, describe the integration complexity, and cite a measurable outcome (Core Web Vitals score, traffic change, time-to-market). An agency that cannot provide this has not delivered at enterprise scale.Ask your agency: Can you share a Next.js App Router case study with similar content volume or language count to our project, including the measured outcome?Red flag: Case studies show design screenshots and describe outcomes as "improved performance" without figures.How Next.js Agencies Were Ranked: MethodologyEvery agency in this list was evaluated against five factors. No agency paid for inclusion. Nextjs agencies ranked higher if they used App Router in production. This was verified through case studies, public repositories, or technical blogs. They also needed to show documented delivery at an enterprise content or traffic scale. Agencies whose public case studies predate the App Router era, or whose documentation suggests primary reliance on the Pages Router, rank lower regardless of brand recognition or team size. They align with how independent reviewers such as top headless CMS agencies and development companies evaluate modern headless and Next.js specialists. FactorWeightSignal UsedApp Router and RSC adoption in productionHighVerified via case studies, public repos, or technical blog postsVercel platform depthHighOfficial partner status, enterprise account evidence, edge middleware usageSEO and Core Web Vitals track recordHighNamed platform certifications; documented content modelling approachHeadless CMS certification and methodologyHighPre/post launch metrics; migration case studies; Metadata API usageEnterprise delivery evidenceMediumNamed clients, measurable outcomes, team scale documentationAgency Comparison MatrixThe matrix below uses factual indicators rather than qualitative labels. Every client's needs differ, but here are the basic agency metrics for you to check.AgencyVercel PartnerCMS Certifications (verified)Named Client with MetricPrimary FitEst. HourlyFocusReactiveYesSanity, Storyblok, Payload, ContentfulEasyPark (35 domains, top 1–5 rankings in 14 countries), Xweather, Arrive (Urban Mobility Platform)Strong engineering team, SaaS focused, Headless CMS sites, SEO migrations$65–120The Software HouseUnverifiedUnverifiedWren kitchens, Pet4HomesWeb apps, team augmentation, SaaS$60–100Dept AgencyUnverifiedContentful (self-reported)Unverified specific metricsGlobal enterprise digital products$100–150PixelmattersUnverifiedUnverifiedVerified/public case and review data mention outcomes (Amigo, partnered with Vodafone; FC Porto; etc.), plus improvements in conversion, engagement, load speed, accessibility, and organic trafficProduct design, UX/UI, web development, mobile app development, especially for SaaS, fintech, cybersecurity, and digital product work$100–$149/hr (Clutch)NeoskopUnverifiedAdobe Experience Cloud (self-reported)UnverifiedDACH SaaS and enterprise$80–120NearFormUnverifiedUnverifiedCondé Nast International, Everstream Analytics (self-reported)Enterprise full-stack, Node.js + React$80–120NetguruUnverifiedUnverifiedING, Volkswagen Financial (self-reported)SaaS product development$75–125BoldareUnverifiedUnverifiedUnverifiedSaaS product squads, agile builds$60–100BlazityYes (Silver)Sanity, Hygraph, Contentful CookUnity (70% LCP), Planday (4x dev velocity)Performance engineering, App Router migrations$70–110Makers' DenUnverifiedStoryblok (self-reported)UnverifiedReact e-commerce, composable commerce$65–105BrainhubUnverifiedUnverifiedUnverifiedStaff augmentation, SaaS frontends$70–120LemonhiveUnverifiedSanity, Storyblok, Payload (self-reported)UnverifiedHeadless for agencies and brands$80–13010CloudsUnverifiedUnverifiedPinterest (self-reported)AI-powered apps, fintech platforms$55–95RigbyUnverifiedUnverifiedUnverifiedB2B/B2C e-commerce platforms$60–100Halo LabUnverifiedUnverifiedCorel, Oppo (self-reported)UI/UX, SMB web apps$40–80
The 15 Next.js Development Agencies in EuropeEach Next.js agency entry follows a consistent schema: location and headcount, verified partnerships, documented client outcomes, primary project fit, tech stack, hourly rate estimate, and time zone. Where information is drawn from self-reported sources, this is stated.1. FocusReactive (Next.js Agency — London / Amsterdam / Warsaw)FocusReactive Next.js Agency







Hourly rate: $65–120
Time zone: GMT/BST (London), CET/CEST— UTC to UTC+2, EST/EDTFocusReactive is an engineering-led Next.js development agency and a certified partner of Sanity, Storyblok, and Payload CMS. They specialise in full-stack Next.js development, headless CMS architecture, and eCommerce integration, helping businesses build, migrate, and replatform composable content systems that are fast, well-governed, and built for long-term scale. The team works within the modern React and headless CMS stack — including Next.js App Router and Vercel — and focuses on two primary engagement types: headless CMS migrations from legacy platforms (such as WordPress, Webflow, and Contentful) and new multilingual Next.js website builds for SaaS companies that require editorial independence after launch. FocusReactive is the technical partner of choice for ambitious digital products that need to perform at scale and remain maintainable for years to come.Documented delivery: The platform achieved top 1–5 search rankings in all active regions (as verified in the FocusReactive case study against EasyPark's public presence).Best fit: SaaS companies requiring multi-market, multilingual headless CMS migrations; marketing teams that need editor independence after handover; enterprises migrating from WordPress or AEM to headless architecture.Stack: Next.js (App Router), Vercel, Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload CMS, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, Shopify Hydrogen2. The Software House (Gliwice / Warsaw)Software House







Hourly rate: $60–100
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Software House is a Next.js development Agency with 12+ years of delivery history across web applications, cloud migrations, and modern frontend development. Their scale (80+ React and Next.js engineers by self-report) makes them a viable option for enterprises that need team extension alongside backend modernisation, rather than a pure frontend specialist. Clutch rating 4.9/5 across 60+ reviews (self-reported, unverified at time of writing).Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific performance metrics were found at time of writing. Clutch reviews cite enterprise clients in manufacturing, fintech, and SaaS, but specific outcomes (Core Web Vitals scores, traffic changes, migration timelines) are not published.Best fit: Enterprise teams needing Next.js development alongside concurrent backend or cloud modernisation work; companies that require a larger augmentation team than boutique agencies can provide.Stack: Next.js, React, Node.js, TypeScript, AWS, .NET, microservices3. Dept (Amsterdam / Berlin / Copenhagen)Dept Agency







Hourly rate: $100–150
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2) for EU offices;Dept is one of the largest independent digital agencies, regularly cited in Gartner rankings for digital experience services. Their Next.js delivery happens within larger brand-driven digital transformation engagements rather than as a standalone React practice. The agency suits enterprise organisations that need design, strategy, and engineering in a single contract, and where Next.js is the chosen frontend framework within a broader platform rebuild.Documented delivery: Dept has documented work with global brands including Google, Audi, and Patagonia (self-reported). Specific Next.js App Router case studies with performance metrics were not found at time of writing.Best fit: Global enterprise brands running multi-region digital transformation programmes where Next.js is one component of a broader platform strategy.Stack: Next.js, React, Contentful, commercetools4. Pixelmatters  (Porto)Pixelmatters company








Hourly rate: $50–99
Time zone: WET/WEST (UTC+0/+1)
These rates align with projects typically ranging from $25,000–$100,000, supporting their expertise in complex, results-driven builds. Pixelmatters is a web development agency founded in 2013, specializing in high-performance websites and digital products using modern JavaScript frameworks. The agency is known for custom web app development, marketing sites, and SaaS platforms with an emphasis on SEO, performance optimization, and scalable architecture for B2B and enterprise clients.Documented DeliveryClients highlight successes like a 40% performance boost and improved SEO rankings for a SaaS platform redesign, alongside a full Next.js migration for an e-learning provider that enhanced load times.Best Fit: Growing SaaS companies, tech startups, and mid-market B2B firms needing performant Next.js/React sites or headless CMS migrations—perfect for those prioritizing Core Web Vitals, SEO scalability, and future-proof tech stacks over traditional CMS.Stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, headless CMS (Sanity, Contentful), Node.js, Vercel/Netlify, with GraphQL and PostgreSQL for data-heavy apps.5. Neoskop  (Mannheim, Germany)Hourly rate: $80–120
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Neoskop is a German-based web development company focused on SaaS and enterprise clients in the DACH region. Neoskop combines product strategy with software engineering delivery, making them a fit for DACH-market companies that value local market proximity and German data compliance standards alongside Next.js delivery. Their positioning emphasises mid-market SaaS rather than large enterprise transformation.Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and performance metrics were found at time of writing. Self-reported client roster includes technology and B2B SaaS companies in Germany and Austria.Best fit: DACH-region SaaS companies that prioritise local agency relationship, German compliance standards, and product-level thinking alongside frontend delivery.Stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, headless CMS platforms6. NearForm  (Waterford, Ireland)Hourly rate: $80–120
Time zone: GMT/IST (UTC+0/+1) — strong overlap with UK and Western EuropeNearForm is an Irish enterprise software engineering company founded in 2011, with a primary specialisation in Node.js, React, and open-source JavaScript infrastructure. They are one of the most active contributors to the Node.js runtime globally and created Fastify — the high-performance Node.js web framework now widely used in enterprise backends. Their React and Next.js capability is deployed within large-scale enterprise digital transformation engagements, typically alongside backend modernisation, AI engineering, or data platform work rather than as standalone frontend delivery. Documented delivery: Condé Nast International (Node.js enterprise engagement, documented client quote on nearform.com). No specific Next.js App Router case studies with Core Web Vitals outcomes were found at time of writing.Best fit: Enterprises running complex Node.js backends who need a React/Next.js frontend layer delivered by the same team; organisations requiring open-source-first architecture and deep JavaScript runtime expertise alongside frontend delivery.Stack: React, Next.js, Node.js, TypeScript, Fastify, GraphQL, AWS, Google Cloud7. Netguru  (Poznań / Warsaw, Poland)Netguru company







Hourly rate: $75–125
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Netguru is one of the most visible software engineering companies in international rankings, with a strong design-engineering integration model suited to early-stage and growth-stage SaaS products. Their Next.js work is delivered within a full product development lifecycle that includes UX design, product strategy, — making them a fit for companies building net-new SaaS platforms than for enterprises migrating existing infrastructure. Documented delivery: Self-reported clients include ING Bank, Volkswagen Financial Services, and Keller Williams. Specific Next.js App Router case studies with performance metrics were not found at time of writing.Best fit: Growth-stage SaaS companies that need a combined design and engineering partner to build a new product from scratch.Stack: Next.js, React, Ruby on Rails, TypeScript8. Boldare (Wrocław / Gdańsk, Poland)Boldare company







Hourly rate: $60–100
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Boldare operates as a product development partner, embedding within client teams to build SaaS products using agile delivery models. They are primarily suited to companies building net-new SaaS platforms rather than migrating existing ones. Their Next.js and React delivery is embedded within a full product lifecycle — design, engineering, testing, and iteration — rather than offered as a standalone frontend service. Clutch rating 4.9/5 (self-reported).Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific Next.js performance metrics were found at time of writing. Clutch reviews reference SaaS clients across fintech, health, and enterprise software.Best fit: SaaS founders and enterprise innovation teams building net-new digital products under an agile retainer model.Stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, headless CMS9. Blazity (Warsaw, Poland)


Hourly rate: $70–110
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Blazity is a Warsaw-based software house operating exclusively within the Next.js and React ecosystem. They are one of the few European agencies where Next.js is not a service line alongside other technologies but the entire practice. Their work divides into four documented areas: performance engineering (diagnosing and resolving Core Web Vitals failures), platform migrations (from Angular, Vue, legacy React/Redux, WordPress, Drupal), full application builds, and production AI agent development on the Vercel AI SDK. Blazity ranked #33 on the Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe 2024 list, with reported revenue growth of 784% in the prior ranking cycle.Open source: Blazity maintains next-enterprise, an enterprise-grade Next.js boilerplate on GitHub built on the App Router with TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, Storybook, and unit, smoke, and e2e testing included. They also maintain a Next.js commerce starter kit and a Next.js Maintenance Mode middleware library.Best fit: Engineering teams with failing Core Web Vitals or stalled migrations; product organisations that need a senior Next.js architecture partner who transfers knowledge rather than creating dependency.Stack: Next.js (App Router), React, TypeScript, Vercel, Sanity, Contentful, Hygraph, Vercel AI SDK, Terraform (for infrastructure as code deployments)10. Makers' Den  (Berlin, Germany  / ReactJS Web Agency)
Hourly rate: $65–105
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Makers' Den is a Berlin-based product agency specialising in React and React Native development with headless CMS and composable commerce integrations. Their focus on custom, high-performance storefronts and full-stack applications positions them for startups and mid-sized businesses that need bespoke UI work alongside Shopify Hydrogen or Storyblok-driven content.Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific performance metrics were found at time of writing.Best fit: Startups and mid-sized businesses building composable e-commerce storefronts or React-native cross-platform products.Stack: React, TypeScript, React Native, Storyblok, Node.js, Shopify Hydrogen11. Brainhub (Gliwice / Warsaw, Poland)

Hourly rate: $70–120
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Brainhub is a software engineering agency whose primary engagement model is team extension — embedding senior engineers into client development teams rather than delivering end-to-end project builds. Their React and Next.js capability is oriented toward SaaS frontend development within existing engineering organisations. Clutch rating 4.9/5 (self-reported).Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific Next.js outcomes were found at time of writing. Clutch reviews reference fintech and SaaS companies as clients.Best fit: Engineering teams that have an existing Next.js codebase and need senior frontend engineers embedded for 6–18 months rather than a full agency build.Stack: React, Node.js, .NET, TypeScript, AWS, React Native12. Lemonhive (London / Global)

Hourly rate: $80–130
Time zone: GMT/BST (London, UTC+0/+1); global remote teamsLemonhive is a headless engineering consultancy focused on complex MACH (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, Headless) architecture builds. Their primary clients are digital agencies that need white-label Next.js and headless CMS delivery depth, and brands with complex integration requirements across commerce, CMS, and authentication layers.Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific performance metrics were found at time of writing.Best fit: Agencies seeking a white-label Next.js engineering partner; brands with complex multi-system integrations requiring MACH architecture expertise.Stack: Next.js, Shopify Hydrogen, Sanity, Storyblok, Payload, React Native, SvelteKit13. 10Clouds (Warsaw, Poland)
Hourly rate: $55–95
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)10Clouds is a software company with a documented specialisation in AI-powered digital products, fintech platforms, and machine learning integrations. Their Next.js capability supports frontend delivery within backend-heavy product builds. They are better suited to projects where the primary engineering challenge is backend complexity or AI integration rather than frontend architecture or CMS-driven content operations. Self-reported clients include Pinterest and Displate.Documented delivery: Pinterest is cited as a client in self-reported materials. Specific Next.js App Router case studies with Core Web Vitals or performance outcomes were not found at time of writing.Best fit: Fintech or AI-product companies that need Next.js frontend work as part of a larger full-stack or AI-engineering engagement.Stack: React, Flutter, Python, Django, machine learning tooling, AI/LLM integrations, DevOps14. Rigby (Wrocław / Warsaw, Poland)

Hourly rate: $60–100
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Rigby is a Polish e-commerce development agency focused on custom B2B, B2C, and multi-vendor commerce platforms. Their technical differentiation is depth in Medusa.js — an open-source headless commerce engine — alongside Next.js for the frontend layer. They are a narrow specialist: the right choice if you are building a custom marketplace, subscription platform, or multi-tenant commerce system, and a poor fit for CMS-driven marketing sites or SaaS dashboards.Documented delivery: No independently verified case studies with named clients and specific performance metrics were found at time of writing. Self-reported clients span North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.Best fit: Companies building custom B2B or B2C commerce platforms with complex models — marketplaces, subscriptions, multi-vendor, multi-tenant — on a modern headless stack.Stack: Next.js, React, Medusa.js, TypeScript, Node.js, composable commerce tooling15. Halo Lab (Odesa / Kyiv / Kharkiv, Ukraine)

Hourly rate: $40–80
Time zone: EET/EEST (UTC+2/+3)Halo Lab is a full-service digital agency with a design-led delivery model, covering branding, UX design, web development, and QA in end-to-end project engagements. Their Next.js delivery sits within design-driven web app and marketing site builds rather than enterprise platform architecture. Self-reported clients include Corel and Oppo.Documented delivery: Corel and Oppo are cited in self-reported materials. Specific Next.js App Router case studies with Core Web Vitals or performance outcomes were not found at time of writing.Best fit: SMBs and startups that need end-to-end design and development in a single engagement, with competitive rates and high design quality as the primary requirement.Stack: React, Next.js, Webflow, CMS development, Node.js, UI/UX tooling, QA frameworksWhy Next.js is the Default React Framework for SaaS and Enterprise Projects in 2026The React framework landscape has consolidated significantly over the past three years. According to the State of JavaScript 2025 survey — 13,000+ respondents, sponsored by Google Chrome and JetBrains — Next.js is used by 59% of JavaScript developers, making it the most adopted meta-framework by a significant margin.Three structural factors explain why Next.js framework has become the default choice for SaaS and enterprise frontend development in Europe specifically.Rendering flexibility within a single framework. Next.js supports SSG, SSR, ISR, React Server Components, and Partial Prerendering within a single project. This means the same engineering team handles performance-critical marketing pages, dynamic SaaS dashboards, and API routes without switching frameworks or splitting the codebase. The App Router, now the default since Next.js 13 and stabilised through versions 14 and 15, has matured into a production-ready foundation that engineering teams are actively building on rather than evaluating.Vercel's edge network for multi-market performance. European SaaS companies typically serve audiences across multiple countries and languages. Vercel's global CDN and edge middleware configuration deliver measurable Core Web Vitals improvements over traditional hosting setups, with direct impact on organic search performance in competitive European markets.Ecosystem maturity. The Next.js integration ecosystem — headless CMS platforms such as React CMS solutions (Storyblok, Sanity, Contentful, Payload), authentication providers (Clerk, Auth.js), commerce platforms (Shopify Hydrogen, Medusa), and observability tooling — has reached a level of maturity that substantially reduces integration risk. Native App Router support for draft mode, the Metadata API, route-level caching configuration, and the Vercel AI SDK for AI-powered features means most production requirements are covered without custom workarounds.Frequently Asked Questions about Next.JS1. What is a Next.js development agency?A Next.js agency is a software engineering company that specialises in building, migrating, and scaling web applications using Next.js — the React meta-framework maintained by Vercel. Unlike a general web development agency, a dedicated Next.js agency employs developers who work exclusively or primarily with Next.js, meaning they have hands-on experience with the App Router, React Server Components, Vercel deployments, and headless CMS integrations. When your Next.js project involves performance-critical rendering, multi-language content architecture, or a migration from a legacy platform, a specialist Next.js agency will make different, and usually better architectural decisions than a generalist team that treats Next.js as one tool among many.2. What does a Next.js agency typically charge in Europe?We can't guarantee 100% accuracy, because everything depends. However, hourly rates for specialist Next.js agencies in Western Europe (UK, Netherlands, Germany) range from $80 to $150. Central European agencies (Poland, Ukraine) typically range from $40 to $100. Total Next.js project costs for a headless CMS migration or a new SaaS marketing site range from $30,000 to $200,000+ depending on content volume, language count, integration complexity, and post-launch support requirements. A Next.js project that involves multiple languages, CMS editorial workflows, and Vercel enterprise deployment will sit toward the upper end of that range regardless of the agency's day rate.
3. What is the difference between the App Router and Pages Router, and why does it matter when hiring a Next.js agency?The Pages Router is Next.js's original routing model, where each file in /pages becomes a route and data fetching happens via getServerSideProps or getStaticProps. The App Router, introduced in Next.js 13, uses a /app directory, supports React Server Components natively, and fundamentally changes how layouts, data fetching, and caching are structured. Vercel is actively developing new features (Partial Prerendering, improved caching primitives) exclusively for the App Router. A Next.js agency still defaulting to the Pages Router for new Next.js projects in 2026 is building on a model that will require migration in the near term — and signals they are not actively working at the current production standard.4. What built-in features does Next.js provide to improve SEO?Next.js aligns its rendering and optimisation defaults with what search engines and Core Web Vitals reward, making good SEO the path of least resistance rather than a bolt-on. The key mechanisms are:SSR and SSG deliver fully rendered HTML to crawlers, unlike client-side React apps that ship an empty <div>. Search engines index pre-rendered content far more reliably.The Metadata API (app/layout.tsx or generateMetadata()) lets you define <title>, <meta description>, Open Graph tags, and canonical URLs declaratively — per page or dynamically based on route params:export async function generateMetadata({ params }) {    return {      title: `Product: ${params.slug}`,      description: "...",      alternates: { canonical: `https://example.com/products/${params.slug}` },    };  }Automatic sitemap.xml and robots.txt are generated via convention-based files (app/sitemap.ts, app/robots.ts), keeping them dynamic and always in sync with your routes.Image optimisation via <Image> enforces correct sizing, serves modern formats (WebP/AVIF), and adds width/height attributes automatically — directly improving LCP and CLS scores.Font optimisation via next/font eliminates layout shift from web fonts by inlining font-face declarations and preloading — directly improving CLS.Streaming and React Server Components reduce TTFB and improve LCP by sending HTML progressively, benefiting both users and crawlers.Structured data (JSON-LD) is injected as a <script> tag in any Server Component, enabling rich results in search.A qualified Next.js agency treats all of these as standard delivery requirements, not optional enhancements.5. What headless CMS platforms work best with Next.js in 2026?Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, and Payload CMS are the four platforms with the deepest documented Next.js App Router integrations. Sanity and Storyblok have native visual editing and draft mode support for React Server Components. Payload is a TypeScript-first, self-hostable CMS that can be run within the same Next.js application. The right CMS choice depends on editorial workflow requirements, content model complexity, localisation needs, and whether the team wants a hosted or self-hosted solution.6. What should a Next.js agency deliver at project close?A production-quality handover from a Next.js agency includes: a TypeScript codebase with automated tests (unit, integration, and ideally end-to-end); documentation covering content model schema, component architecture, and deployment processes; redirect mapping validated against the pre-launch crawl; a configured Vercel project with environment variables scoped correctly to staging and production; editor training and documentation for the CMS; and a defined post-launch support period with documented SLAs for critical and non-critical issues.7. When should I hire a Next.js agency instead of a freelancer? A freelancer is the right choice when scope is tight, the project is well-defined, and you need one or two specific skills — a performance audit, a CMS integration, a specific component build. A Next.js agency makes more sense when the project has moving parts that require multiple disciplines at once (architecture, frontend, CMS configuration, DevOps, QA), when the stakes of getting the architecture wrong are high, or when you need continuity after launch.

Choosing the best Next.js agency comes down to verified delivery, CMS specialisation, and a fit with your product stage. This guide profiles 16 leading professional Next.js development services (from performance-engineering specialists to enterprise digital transformation firms) covering hourly rates, time zones, Vercel partnership status, and named client outcomes. Whether you need a Next.js development company for an App Router migration, a greenfield SaaS build, or a headless CMS implementation, check the real portfolio of FocusReactive agency known for its Next.js development services across Sanity CMS, Storyblok, Payload, and Contentful. 
According to the Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025 (49,000+ respondents), React and Next.js are leading web frameworks, while Svelte, Vue.js, and Astro are gaining traction.TL;DR: Best Next.js Agency Quick ListHiring a Next.js agency is one of the highest-leverage decisions for any business, be it a budding startup or SaaS founder, or enterprise product owner. Anyway, this is the choice for solution seekers and result-oriented leaders. The market is full of professional developers across Next.js agencies of all sizes, but you'd do better to assess your actual needs before choosing: whether that's a migration, a replatforming, or a build from scratch.Key market context: Next.js powers ~2.6% of the entire internet, with nearly 18,000 companies using it in production. In 2026, the bar has risen, strong agencies must know the App Router, React Server Components, and rendering strategy deeply, not just write components.If you need a company focused on Next.js framework, be ready to the rates that range: $40-100/hr (Central Europe) · $80-150/hr (Western Europe) · Projects typically run $30k-$200k+Next.js Development Agency highlights listed by use caseBest for headless CMS / SaaS migrations: FocusReactive (London/Amsterdam/Warsaw)Best for enterprise digital transformation: Dept (Amsterdam/Berlin)Best for SEO-critical migrations: 9thCO (Toronto)Best for Node.js-heavy backends + Next.js frontend: NearForm (Ireland)Best for DACH market / compliance: Neoskop (Germany)Best for headless commerce: Rigby (Poland)Best for healthcare projects: Sidebench (Los Angeles)Best for staff augmentation: Brainhub or DigisBest for ecommerce projects: Roboto studioStay here for more, if you're a Chief Marketing Officer or a leading figure in your marketing team, a decision-maker, CTO, VPs of Engineering, or a hands-on founder at mid-market SaaS companies and enterprise digital teams evaluating a Next.js development agency for upcoming projects.Migrating a legacy platform (WordPress, Webflow, Drupal, AEM) to a headless Next.js architectureBuilding a new SaaS frontend or Next.js website from scratch on the App RouterScaling an existing Next.js codebase that has outgrown the original team's capacity What is a Next.js agency?A Next.js agency (also called a Next.js development company) is a specialized software development firm that builds web applications using the Next.js framework. It typically operates as a structured team, commonly consist of 5-10 engineers, 2 business developers, a QA engineer, an optional project manager to curate your project, and supporting marketing roles such as a strategist and content editor. These agencies serve clients ranging from early-stage startups to large enterprises, functioning as an external vendor team over an engagement period that usually spans several months. That's why such factors like timezone alignment means a lot from the outset.Next.js Developers: Market, Rates & Hidden Pitfalls in 2026Market situationNext.js has become one of the most widely deployed web frameworks in production environments. In 2026, nearly 18,000 verified companies use it across industries, company sizes, and geographies. Its adoption spans well beyond tech companies — financial services (3.78%), retail (3.36%), and advertising (1.80%) are among the largest non-tech verticals, making it a horizontal framework rather than a niche one. Underpinning this is the broader React ecosystem: React maintains a 69.74% market share and, with the release of React 19 and the React Compiler, the ecosystem continues to reinvent itself while sustaining enterprise demand.The framework has also matured significantly in terms of role definition. Next.js-specific roles now exist at major companies rather than generic React-with-Next.js positions, and demand has shifted toward developers who can reason about rendering strategies, not just write components. The core skills in demand have shifted accordingly: strong Next.js engineers in 2026 are expected to combine React, TypeScript, App Router, Server Components, API integration, testing, and performance-centric rendering, a meaningfully higher bar than a few years ago.Demand signalsDemand is consistently strong and shows no sign of cooling. Next.js developers are considered future-proof in 2026, with particular premium placed on those focused on server components, streaming, and AI-driven experiences. Hiring priorities have expanded to encompass full-stack scope, performance-driven culture, and AI-assisted engineering practices, with roles spanning UI, API routes, databases, and observability in one integrated stack. Edge-runtime deployment patterns are also becoming a hiring signal: teams want developers who understand Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, and database connection management, not just component authorship.Next.js Developer ratesRates vary substantially by region, seniority, and, critically, by which version of Next.js the developer actually knows in depth. According to Lemon.io, App Router expertise is the single biggest rate lever in 2026. Developers who ship production-grade Server Components and streaming SSR routinely bill $10–$15/hr above peers still working on the Pages Router. Developers who pair Next.js with edge-runtime deployment, Prisma/Drizzle ORM layers, or React Server Actions at scale command $55–$62/hr in Europe and $75–$85/hr in North America.Broadly by regionA full-time dedicated offshore developer from Eastern Europe costs roughly $2,800–$4,800/month. The equivalent from India runs $1,600–$3,200/month. A senior full-time developer in the US costs $12,000–$18,000/month, and in the UK/EU, $9,000–$14,000/month. React Native and Next.js specialists typically command a 15–35% premium over standard React rates, and beyond hourly billing, benefits, training, and recruitment overhead can add 15–25% to the true cost of a hire.Hidden pitfalls when hiring Next.js developersThis is where most hiring decisions go wrong. The framework's rapid evolution since the App Router introduction in Next.js 13 means there is a large cohort of developers with years of Next.js experience that is effectively outdated.Pages Router vs. App Router gap. Many developers with three or four years of Next.js experience built entirely on the Pages Router model. The App Router is not an incremental upgrade — it requires a different mental model entirely, shifting from "pages" to "what the user needs first," with Server Components as the default and use client added only where interactivity is genuinely required. A developer who hasn't made this shift will write slow, bloated applications while believing they're writing modern Next.js.Misuse of use client. Many developers coming from Create React App or Vite mark every component as a Client Component, which defeats the purpose of the App Router entirely. The correct pattern is to keep data-fetching components on the server and only add use client to components that use hooks, event handlers, or browser APIs. This mistake is invisible in development but measurable in production bundle size and performance.Async params in Next.js 15. The switch from synchronous to asynchronous params and searchParams in Next.js 15 is the single biggest migration gotcha — if dynamic routes return undefined values, the likely cause is failing to await the params Promise. A developer who hasn't worked on a post-v15 codebase won't know this exists.Database connection pooling. Without a singleton pattern for database clients like Prisma, hot reloads create new database connections until the connection pool is exhausted — an issue that surfaces under load rather than in local development, making it easy to miss until the product is in production.Vendor lock-in through Vercel defaults. Next.js and Vercel are developed by the same company, and the framework's default behaviours — caching, image optimisation, edge functions — are tuned for the Vercel platform. Developers who only know how to deploy to Vercel create an infrastructure dependency that can become expensive at scale or difficult to migrate away from. The right hire understands self-hosting trade-offs.Seniority inflation. Because Next.js is a popular framework, the market is saturated with mid-level developers who describe themselves as senior. The practical screen is straightforward: ask them to explain when they would choose a Server Component over a Client Component, how they handle cache revalidation, and what their data-fetching strategy looks like end to end. The senior line in Next.js is not years of React, it's whether a developer can own a data-fetching strategy end to end: when to use Server Components, when to reach for Client Components, how to handle cache revalidation. Candidates who answer vaguely on these points, regardless of years of experience, are operating below the level they're billing at.This guide evaluates 15 best Next.js development agencies in 2026, covering technical depth, verified CMS partnerships, Vercel platform experience, and documented client outcomes, so you can identify the right Next.js developers for your specific project without relying on rankings that prioritize brand size over delivery evidence.Why Next.js?Among all React frameworks in the whole React ecosystem, even over plain React, Next.js stays apart and grows in popularity as the core choice when you need high performance (automatic code splitting, image optimization, etc.), stable SEO rankings, or full-stack features without stitching together multiple separate tools. Take just the 4 basic tech criteria that Next.js provides you with:Server-side rendering (SSR) – pages rendered on the server for speed and SEOStatic site generation (SSG) – pre-built pages at build time for maximum performanceFull-stack capability – API routes let you write backend logic in the same projectHybrid flexibility – mix static, server-rendered, and client-rendered pages as neededNextjs remains the core technology for creating 140k stars on GitHub, and the framework  currently powers 3.2% of all websites where the JavaScript library is known, which accounts for roughly 2.6% of the entire internet. Many well-known companies use Next.js for various purposes, e.g., TikTok, Uber, Nike, Stripe, Wayfair, Notion, and Apple. Next.js framework is commonly used by developers for these types of projects:Content & MarketingCorporate websites and landing pagesBlogs and news/magazine sitesPortfolio and personal websitesDocumentation sitesE-commerceOnline stores (often paired with Shopify, Stripe, or custom backends)Product catalog and listing pagesMarketplacesWeb ApplicationsSaaS dashboards and admin panelsCRM and project management toolsAnalytics platformsData-heavy / SEO-critical appsJob boards and listing sitesReal estate platformsTravel site and booking content platformsFull-stack AppsApps that use Next.js API routes as the backend (no separate server needed)Apps integrated with databases via ORMs like PrismaIt's less commonly chosen for highly interactive apps with no SEO concern (a pure SPA might suffice) or for non-React teams.Next.js website agency evaluation criteriaKey buying signals to verify before committing to any Next.js development agency: App Router in production (not Pages Router), named Vercel partner status, at least one case study with a measured outcome, and a defined post-launch SLA.8 Criteria to Compare a Next.js Development Company in 2026These criteria should be applied before reviewing any company providing Nextjs development services. Outline your project needs for each criterion, then score the agencies based on your requirements, not against each other in the abstract.1. Next.js App Router and React Server Component FluencyAny Next.js agency doing serious work in 2026 should be building on the App Router by default — it is the current production standard and the only model Vercel is actively developing new features for. An agency still defaulting to the Pages Router for new projects, or that cannot clearly explain the Client/Server Component boundary, is working on a deprecated paradigm.Ask your agency: Are your current production projects on the App Router or Pages Router? How do you decide which components are Server Components versus Client Components?Red flag: Defaults to "use client" on most components, or describes App Router as "still evaluating."2. Next.js Rendering Strategy DepthA capable Next.js agency should be able to tell you exactly which rendering strategy — SSG, ISR, SSR, or RSC — applies to each layer of your application and why, including the caching and cost implications of each choice. If the answer is "we use SSR for everything," that is not a strategy, it is a default.Ask your agency: How do you decide between SSG, ISR, and dynamic rendering in an App Router project? How do you handle cache invalidation when CMS content updates?Red flag: Cannot explain the difference between route-level and component-level caching in the App Router.3. Vercel Platform DepthProduction Next.js deployment on Vercel goes well beyond connecting a GitHub repo — it requires managing edge middleware, environment variable scoping, preview deployments, build cost optimisation, and observability tooling. An agency that has only used Vercel's free tier has not encountered the challenges enterprise deployments surface.Ask your agency: Have you managed Vercel enterprise accounts with multiple deployment targets? Have you configured Edge Middleware for geo-routing or A/B testing?Red flag: Cannot describe how they manage Vercel build costs or have never used Speed Insights for production diagnostics.4. Headless CMS Integration as Part of Next.js Development ServicesDeep CMS integration means designing the content model, configuring draft mode for live preview with React Server Components, and ensuring editors can operate independently after handover, not just connecting the API and fetching data. Ask for a certified partnership and a concrete content modelling example, not a list of supported platforms.Ask your agency: Are you a certified partner of the CMS we are considering? How do you implement draft mode with Server Components for live preview?Red flag: Treats CMS setup as a configuration task with no content modelling methodology to show.5. SEO Continuity and Core Web Vitals MethodologyFor platform migrations, organic search equity is a business asset that can be destroyed by poor redirect handling or metadata loss. A qualified Next.js agency treats Core Web Vitals and URL continuity as engineering deliverables from sprint one, not as post-launch cleanup.Ask: How do you handle URL mapping and redirect implementation during a migration? Can you show pre/post Core Web Vitals benchmarks from a previous project?Red flag: Redirects are handled at the end of the project, or the agency cannot produce crawl comparisons from past migrations.6. TypeScript and Code Quality: What to Expect from Senior Next.js DevelopersThe codebase a Next.js agency delivers will be maintained by your internal team or a future agency — TypeScript by default, automated tests, and clear documentation are baseline requirements, not premium extras.Ask your agency: Is TypeScript the default on all projects? What testing framework and coverage standards do your Next.js developers apply?Red flag: Delivers JavaScript-only codebases or has no automated testing in the handover.7. Post-Launch Support and SLA StructureThe first 90 days after launch consistently surface redirect gaps, content model edge cases, and performance regressions. A Next.js agency without a formal post-launch support period and documented SLAs will deprioritise incidents because those hours are unscoped and unbillable.Ask your agency: What are your SLAs for critical production bugs in the first 90 days? Is a retainer model available for ongoing work?Red flag: No formal post-launch support structure beyond "reach out if something breaks.8. Enterprise Delivery EvidencePortfolio logos are not delivery evidence, ask for case studies that name a client, describe the integration complexity, and cite a measurable outcome (Core Web Vitals score, traffic change, time-to-market). An agency that cannot provide this has not delivered at enterprise scale. Ask your agency: Can you share a Next.js App Router case study with similar content volume or language count to our project, including the measured outcome?Red flag: Case studies show design screenshots and describe outcomes as "improved performance" without figures.Next.js Development Agency Evaluation Factor
1. App Router and RSC adoption in productionVerified via case studies, public repos, or technical blog posts2. Vercel platform depthOfficial partner status, enterprise account evidence, edge middleware usage3. SEO and Core Web Vitals track record
Named platform certification; documented content modelling approach4. Headless CMS Certification Methodology
Pre/post launch metrics; migration case Studies, and Metadata API usage5. Enterprise delivery evidence
Famous clients, measurable outcomes, team scale documentationHow Next.js Agencies Were Ranked: MethodologyEvery agency in this list was evaluated against five factors. No agency paid for inclusion.Nextjs agencies are ranked higher if they used App Router in production. This was verified through case studies, public repositories, or technical blogs. They also needed to show documented delivery at an enterprise content or traffic scale. Those agencies whose public case studies predate the App Router era, or whose documentation suggests primary reliance on the Pages Router, rank lower regardless of brand recognition or team size. They align with how independent reviewers such as top headless CMS agencies and development companies evaluate modern headless and Next.js specialists.Top 15 Nextjs Agencies / Next.js Development Companies (Global Round-Up)1. FocusReactive Hourly rate: $65-120
Time zone: GMT/BST (London), CET/CEST (Amsterdam, Warsaw) — UTC to UTC+2, EST/EDTFocusReactive is an engineering-led Next.js development agency and a certified partner of Sanity, Storyblok, and Payload CMS. They specialise in full-stack Next.js development, headless CMS architecture, and eCommerce integration, helping businesses build, migrate, and replatform composable content systems that are fast, well-governed, and built for long-term scale. The team works within the modern React and headless CMS stack, including Next.js App Router and Vercel, and focuses on two primary engagement types: headless CMS migrations from legacy platforms (such as WordPress, Webflow, and Contentful) and new multilingual Next.js website builds for SaaS companies that require editorial independence after launch. FocusReactive is the technical partner of choice for ambitious digital products that need to perform at scale and remain maintainable for years to come.Best fit: SaaS companies requiring multi-market, multilingual headless CMS migrations; enterprises migrating from WordPress or AEM to headless architecture, marketing teams that need editor independence after handover; 
Stack: Next.js (App Router), Vercel, Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload CMS, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, Shopify Hydrogen2. Dept Agency
Hourly rate: $100-150
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2) for EU offices;Dept is one of the largest independent digital agencies, regularly cited in Gartner rankings for digital experience services. Their Next.js delivery happens within larger brand-driven digital transformation engagements rather than as a standalone React practice. The agency suits enterprise organisations that need design, strategy, and engineering in a single contract, and where Next.js is the chosen frontend framework within a broader platform rebuild.Best fit: Global enterprise brands running multi-region digital transformation programmes where Next.js is one component of a broader platform strategy.
Stack: Next.js, React, Contentful, commercetools3. Pixelmatters
Hourly rate: $50-99
Time zone: WET/WEST (UTC+0/+1)
Pixelmatters is a Next.js web development agency, specializing in high-performance websites and digital products. The agency is known for custom web app development, marketing sites, and SaaS platforms with an emphasis on SEO, performance optimization, and scalable architecture for B2B and enterprise clients.

Best Fit: Growing SaaS companies, tech startups, and mid-market B2B firms needing performant Next.js/React sites or headless CMS migrations—perfect for those prioritizing Core Web Vitals, SEO scalability, and future-proof tech stacks over traditional CMS.
Tech stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, headless CMS (Sanity, Contentful), Node.js, Vercel/Netlify, with GraphQL and PostgreSQL for data-heavy apps.4. The Software House
Hourly rate: $60-100
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Software House is a custom software development company (not  with 12+ years of delivery history across web applications, cloud migrations, and modern frontend development. Their scale (80+ React and Next.js engineers by self-report) makes them a viable option for enterprises that need team extension alongside backend modernisation, rather than a pure frontend specialist. Best fit: Enterprise teams needing Next.js development alongside concurrent backend or cloud modernisation work; companies that require a larger augmentation team than boutique agencies can provide.
Stack: Next.js, React, Node.js, TypeScript, AWS, .NET, microservices5. Neoskop 
Hourly rate: $80-120
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Neoskop is a German-based web development company focused on SaaS and enterprise clients in the DACH region. Neoskop combines product strategy with software engineering delivery, making them a fit for DACH-market companies that value local market proximity and German data compliance standards alongside Next.js delivery. Their positioning emphasises mid-market SaaS rather than large enterprise transformation.Best fit: DACH-region SaaS companies that prioritise local agency relationship, German compliance standards, and product-level thinking alongside frontend delivery.
Tech stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, headless CMS platforms6. NearForm 
Hourly rate: $80-120
Time zone: GMT/IST (UTC+0/+1) — strong overlap with UK and Western EuropeNearForm is an Irish enterprise software engineering company founded in 2011, with a primary specialisation in Node.js, React, and open-source JavaScript infrastructure. They are one of the most active contributors to the Node.js runtime globally and created Fastify — the high-performance Node.js web framework now widely used in enterprise backends. Their React and Next.js capability is deployed within large-scale enterprise digital transformation engagements, typically alongside backend modernisation, AI engineering, or data platform work rather than as standalone frontend delivery.Best fit: Enterprises running complex Node.js backends who need a React/Next.js frontend layer delivered by the same team; organisations requiring open-source-first architecture and deep JavaScript runtime expertise alongside frontend delivery.
Tech stack: React, Next.js, Node.js, TypeScript, Fastify, GraphQL, AWS, Google Cloud7. Netguru
Hourly rate: $75-125
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Netguru is one of the most visible software engineering agencies in international rankings, with a strong design-engineering integration model suited to early-stage and growth-stage SaaS products. Their Next.js work is delivered within a full product development lifecycle that includes UX design, product strategy, making them a fit for companies building net-new SaaS platforms than for enterprises migrating existing infrastructure. Best fit: Growth-stage SaaS companies that need a combined design and engineering partner to build a new product from scratch.
Tech stack: Next.js, React, Ruby on Rails, TypeScript8. 9thCO
Hourly rate: $75-125
Time zone: EST/EDT (UTC−5/−4) / Toronto, Canada9thCO is a digital agency founded in 2013 with an origin story that sets it apart: born as a technical SEO firm, it has organically grown into a comprehensive full-stack design and development agency. 9thCO’s website rebuild, moving off Drupal 8 to a Next.js and Storyblok stack, saw Core Web Vitals scores improve from 73 to 100, with the team going from staging to live in a matter of days. A separate headless CMS project resulted in a 26.2% increase in FTB sales.Best fit: Mid-market brands and e-commerce operators that need a headless CMS migration handled without SEO regression—particularly teams on Drupal, WordPress, or legacy platforms looking to move to Storyblok or Strapi on a Next.js frontend, with in-house SEO validation baked into the delivery process.
Tech stack: Next.js, React, TypeScript, Storyblok, Strapi, Sanity, Prismic, Shopify Plus, Auth0, Prisma, Node.js, Vercel9. EchobindHourly rate: not publicly available
Timezone: EST/EDT (UTC−5/−4), US-based (Boston, MA & Encinitas, CA)Echobind is an engineering consultancy founded in 2015, operating at the intersection of React Native, React, Node.js, design, and digital strategy. They self-describe as an engineering-first firm specialising in healthcare, payments, and AI solutions delivered by senior engineers. Their practice spans four documented areas: new product development (from research through to shipped software), improving and extending existing products, team augmentation, and strategic advisory across product, design, and engineering. Best fit: CTOs and product organisations that need a technical partner to ship mission-critical systems correctly the first time; companies in regulated industries like healthcare and fintech that need engineers who understand domain constraints; teams that want to borrow senior-level strategy, design, or engineering capacity without a long-term commitment.Tech stack: React, React Native, Next.js, Node.js, Postgres, Figma, plus API and microservices, cross-platform mobile development, and Stripe implementation; more recently expanded into AI and machine learning integration10. Thinkmill Hourly rate: not publicly available
Timezone: AEST/AEDT (UTC+10/+11), Australia

Thinkmill is an engineering consultancy founded in 2013, operating at the intersection of React, Next.js, GraphQL, and headless CMS infrastructure. They are internationally recognised for their work in design systems, content management systems, and front-end infrastructure. Their practice is divided into four documented areas: full product design and engineering (from research through to React front-ends), design systems at scale, CMS migrations and headless architecture, and team augmentation for engineering organisations. Best fit: Product organisations and engineering teams that need a senior React/Next.js architecture partner with deep design systems expertise; teams migrating from legacy CMS setups to headless; enterprises needing embedded augmentation without creating long-term dependency.
Tech stack: React, Next.js, Astro, GraphQL, Keystone, Keystatic, TypeScript, Node.js, Vercel, JAMstack solutions11. Brainhub
Hourly rate: $70-120
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)Brainhub is a software engineering agency whose primary engagement model is team extension — embedding senior engineers into client development teams rather than delivering end-to-end project builds. Their React and Next.js capability is oriented toward SaaS frontend development within existing engineering organisations. Clutch rating 4.9/5 (self-reported).Best fit: Engineering teams that have an existing Next.js codebase and need senior frontend engineers embedded for 6–18 months rather than a full agency build.
Tech stack: React, Node.js, .NET, TypeScript, AWS, React Native12. Lemonhive
Hourly rate: $80-130
Time zone: GMT/BST (London, UTC+0/+1); global remote teamsLemonhive is a consultancy focused on complex MACH (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, Headless) architecture builds. Their primary clients are digital agencies that need white-label Next.js and headless CMS delivery depth, and brands with complex integration requirements across commerce, CMS, and authentication layers.Best fit: Agencies seeking a white-label Next.js engineering partner; brands with complex multi-system integrations requiring MACH architecture expertise.
Tech stack: Next.js, Shopify Hydrogen, Sanity, Storyblok, Payload, React Native, SvelteKit13. 10Clouds
Hourly rate: $55-95
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2)10Clouds is a software company with a documented specialisation in AI-powered digital products, fintech platforms, and machine learning integrations. Their Next.js capability supports frontend delivery within backend-heavy product builds. They are better suited to projects where the primary engineering challenge is backend complexity or AI integration rather than frontend architecture or CMS-driven content operations. Self-reported clients include Pinterest and Displate.Best fit: Fintech or AI-product companies that need Next.js frontend work as part of a larger full-stack or AI-engineering engagement.
Tech stack: React, Next.js, Flutter, Python, Django, machine learning tooling, AI/LLM integrations, DevOps14. RigbyHourly rate: $60-100
Time zone: CET/CEST (UTC+1/+2) / PolandRigby is an e-commerce development agency focused on custom B2B, B2C, and multi-vendor commerce platforms. Their technical differentiation is depth in Medusa.js, an open-source headless commerce engine, alongside Next.js for the frontend layer. This Nextjs agency is right choice if you need to build a custom marketplace, subscription platform, or multi-tenant commerce system, and a poor fit for CMS-driven marketing sites or SaaS dashboards.Best fit: Companies building custom B2B or B2C commerce platforms with complex models — marketplaces, subscriptions, multi-vendor, multi-tenant — on a modern headless stack.
Tech stack: Next.js, React, Medusa.js, TypeScript, Node.js, composable commerce tooling15. Sidebench
Hourly rate: $50-$99/hr (Clutch-listed), 
Timezone: PST/PDT (UTC−8/−7)Sidebench is a UX design from Los Angeles, and software engineering consultancy founded in 2012, with a primary focus on healthcare digital transformation and high-growth ventures. They bring together four strengths in a single team: technology and product strategy, UX-first product design, pragmatic systems and data architecture, and secure, HIPAA-compliant engineering. Their work spans structured discovery and roadmapping, net-new mobile and web platform builds, and enterprise digital transformation. Best fit: Healthcare innovators, funded startups, and enterprise innovation groups that need structured discovery, compliance-aware (HIPAA) design, and senior product stewardship on complex mobile and web platforms. Not the right fit for cost-sensitive projects or rapid staff augmentation needs.
Tech stack: React, AWS, React Native, iOS, Android, Node.js, AngularJS
Key Things to Know Before Hiring a Next.js Development Agency If organic search is your core growth channel, working with a Next.js development agency that integrates technical SEO into the engineering process from day one is the most important selection criterionCheck the relevant portfolio: case studies that show business outcomes (conversion lift, traffic growth, faster workflows) are more valuable than generic gallery screenshotsThe best choice also depends on your project type: SaaS app, ecommerce, enterprise migration, startup MVP, or a marketing site. Compare and match your needs with the appropriate developers experienceWrapping Up on Next.js ServicesNext.js development services are in high demand among product teams and marketing organizations that need fast, SEO-optimized web experiences without sacrificing developer flexibility. As a React-based framework with built-in support for server-side rendering, static site generation, and edge deployment, Next.js has become the default frontend choice for headless CMS architectures, including Sanity-powered builds. Companies looking for Next.js development services typically want more than framework expertise: they need engineers who are good at Core Web Vitals, App Router architecture, incremental static regeneration, and know how to wire a performant frontend to a structured content backend. Plus, AI tool integration won't be superfluous. Whether you're migrating a WordPress site, launching a composable commerce storefront, or rebuilding a marketing site as a product, the right Next.js development partner brings both the engineering depth and the editorial UX thinking to ship something that ranks, converts, and scales.Frequently Asked Questions about Next.JS developers and Nextjs Agencies1. What is a Next.js development agency?A Next.js agency is an engineering company that specialises in building, migrating, and scaling web applications using Next.js — the React meta-framework maintained by Vercel. Unlike a general web development agency, a dedicated Next.js agency employs developers who work primarily with Next.js framework, meaning they have hands-on experience with the App Router, React Server Components, Vercel deployments, and headless CMS integrations. When your Next.js project involves performance-critical rendering, multi-language content architecture, or a migration from a legacy platform, a specialist Next.js agency will make different, and usually better architectural decisions than a generalist team that treats Next.js as one tool among many.2. How much does a Next.js agency charge on average?We can't guarantee 100% accuracy, because everything depends. However, hourly rates for Next.js agencies' services in Western Europe (UK, Netherlands, Germany) range from $80 to $150. Central European agencies (Poland, Ukraine) typically range from $40 to $100. Total Next.js project costs for a headless CMS migration or a new SaaS marketing site range from $30,000 to $200,000+ depending on content volume, language count, integration complexity, and post-launch support requirements. A Next.js project that involves multiple languages, CMS editorial workflows, and Vercel enterprise deployment will sit toward the upper end of that range regardless of the agency's day rate.
3. What headless CMS platforms work best with Next.js in 2026?Sanity CMS, Storyblok, Contentful, and Payload CMS are the four platforms with the deepest documented Next.js App Router integrations. Sanity and Storyblok have native visual editing and draft mode support for React Server Components. Payload CMS is a TypeScript-first, self-hostable CMS that can be run within the same Next.js application. The right CMS choice depends on editorial workflow requirements, content model complexity, localisation needs, and whether the team wants a hosted or self-hosted solution. 4. What should a Next.js agency deliver at project close?A production-quality handover from a Next.js agency includes: a TypeScript codebase with automated tests (unit, integration, and ideally end-to-end); documentation covering content model schema, component architecture, and deployment processes; redirect mapping validated against the pre-launch crawl; a configured Vercel project with environment variables scoped correctly to staging and production; editor training and documentation for the CMS; and a defined post-launch support period with documented SLAs for critical and non-critical issues.5. Where to find Next.js agencies proven by real reviews?Many businesses usually use and find Next.js services on platforms like Toptal, Upwork, or LinkedIn, searching for a dedicated Next.js company. Take Clutch reviews as a guarantee, because its verification system excludes fraudulent schemes and differs from the dozens of other web platforms with listings of developers’ agencies.6. Does a Next.js Agency (e.g., FocusReactive) offer post-launch CMS support and team training?Yes, CMS agencies in this niche typically provide ongoing help rather than just a one-off build. FocusReactive offers post‑launch CMS support and team training, though the exact format of the majority of Next.js agencies are usually tailored only per project.7. When should I hire a Next.js agency instead of a freelancer?A freelance developer is the right choice when scope is tight, the project is well-defined, and you need one or two specific skills: a performance audit, a CMS integration, a specific component build. A Next.js agency makes more sense when the project has moving parts that require multiple disciplines at once (architecture, frontend, CMS configuration, DevOps, QA), when the stakes of getting the architecture wrong are high, or when you need continuity after launch.

The best headless CMS agency or headless web development partner for your project is the one that recommends the right platform for your context — not the one they are most comfortable with. This guide ranks agencies on verifiable CMS expertise, platform breadth, migration track record, and documented editorial outcomes.TL;DRA genuine headless CMS agency recommends the right platform for each client context; multi-platform production experience and content modeling depth are the two criteria that separate specialists from frontend shops that happen to use a CMSPlatform partnership tiers and listing platform rankings are commercially influenced signals — verified review content describing specific editorial and business outcomes is more reliableKey selection criteria: verified production cases across at least three CMS platforms; content modeling treated as a core deliverable not a configuration task; evidence the agency has recommended against their preferred platform for a specific client; testimonials from editorial stakeholders, not only technical leadsFocusReactive ranks first: six CMS platforms in production, official partnerships on four, vendor-agnostic selection verified across case studiesMid-complexity implementations typically start at $30,000; migrations with content modeling redesign run $50,000–$150,000; enterprise multi-market builds start at $150,000Top 4 headless CMS agencies in 20261. FocusReactive — the most platform-complete headless CMS agency on this list; official partners of Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, and Payload CMS; production experience on Directus and DatoCMS; genuine vendor-agnostic selection process with a proprietary CMS toolkit refined across dozens of deployments2. Anything Agency — 10+ years headless-only delivery; Storyblok UK & Ireland Partner of the Year; Contentful certified; deep editorial case studies including long-term enterprise partnerships3. Bits Orchestra — .NET and CMS specialist with Kentico Xperience Bronze Partner status plus Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and Umbraco; strongest for enterprise portal modernisation and B2B organisations in the Microsoft ecosystem4. The Frontend Company — frontend-led headless CMS integration with a documented multi-platform practice across Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, and DirectusIntroStructured content has quietly become the foundation of two of the most consequential shifts in digital right now: editorial teams that can publish, localise, and iterate without raising a developer ticket, and content that surfaces in AI-generated answers rather than only in traditional search rankings. Both outcomes depend less on which headless CMS you choose and more on how deeply the agency implementing it understands content modeling, governance, and the relationship between content structure and machine readability.The headless CMS software market reached approximately $820 million to $1.3 billion in 2024, expanding to an estimated $970 million to $1.5 billion in 2025, according to Future Market Insights. This represents two to three times the growth rate of the overall CMS market.The broader global CMS market stands at approximately $31–35 billion in 2025, according to Mordor Intelligence and Grand View Research, growing at a 7.7–10.6% CAGR through the early 2030s. Within that total, the headless segment is far smaller but far faster-growing.This shift has structural drivers. Gartner requires composability as a mandatory criterion for inclusion in its Magic Quadrant for Digital Experience Platforms, and projects that 70% of organisations will be mandated to acquire composable DXP technology by 2026, up from 50% in 2023. What was a developer preference three years ago has become enterprise infrastructure policy.That change raises the bar for what agencies need to deliver. A team with experience on one headless CMS is not the same as an agency that has selected, migrated to, and governed five different headless platforms across varied client contexts. As the market matures, that distance grows.What makes a legitimate headless CMS agencyMost comparable lists rank each headless CMS development company by Clutch position or platform partner directory placement. Both signals are compromised: Clutch and DesignRush offer paid tier upgrades that influence placement without transparent disclosure, and platform partner status can be acquired for business development purposes rather than reflecting deployment volume or client outcomes. We used review platforms as sources of verified feedback content only — not as ranking inputs.The criteria below are harder to fake and more predictive of outcomes.Multi-platform portfolio (highest weight)A genuine headless CMS agency has delivered real client work across at least three distinct platforms — for example, Contentful, Storyblok, Sanity, Payload, Directus, Hygraph, or Prismic. Agencies that default every client to a single platform are not making advisory recommendations; they are extending their own technical familiarity at the client's expense. Different client contexts require different platforms: a marketing team that needs visual editing independence is poorly served by Sanity's developer-centric studio; an enterprise managing structured content across 20 locales is poorly served by a self-hosted Strapi instance without the infrastructure to support it.Verified client outcomes — reviews and casesWe focused on verified reviews that describe specific content-related outcomes: faster publishing workflows, reduced editorial support tickets, migrations completed without search ranking loss, measurable cost reduction versus the prior stack. Reviews from editorial and marketing stakeholders — not only CTOs — are a particularly strong signal, because they confirm the agency built something that non-technical users can actually operate.Content modeling depthContent modeling — the architecture of content types, fields, relationships, and reusable components that underpins a headless implementation — is where genuine CMS expertise lives. Agencies that treat it as a configuration task rather than a design discipline produce implementations that work on launch day and degrade over the following 18 months as editors encounter the limits of the model.Platform-agnostic advisory evidenceThe strongest signal of client-oriented practice is evidence that an agency has explained when not to use their preferred platform. Published comparison content, case studies with documented platform selection reasoning, and the ability to articulate trade-offs honestly are all relevant markers.Migration track recordCMS migrations stress-test expertise. Moving from a traditional CMS to a headless platform, or from one headless platform to another, requires simultaneous competence in content architecture, data transformation, SEO preservation, and editorial change management. Verifiable migration cases with named clients, named platforms, and described scope are a reliable quality proxy.ial and non-technical stakeholder focusA CMS exists primarily for editors and content managers. Agencies that design for developer convenience but neglect editorial usability deliver technically clean systems that require IT involvement for routine content updates. Case studies mentioning editor training, content governance, and workflow design — and testimonials from marketing or content roles — are positive signals.Comparison table
AgencyCMS platformsBest forMigration depthVendor-agnostic1.FocusReactiveSanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload, Directus, DatoCMS Multi-platform CMS builds, localisation, content architectureStrongYes — documented2. Anything AgencyStoryblok, Contentful | Editorial-focused headless, UK enterpriseEditorial-focused headless, UK enterpriseStrongPartial — two platforms3.Bits OrchestraKentico, Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, Umbraco.NET enterprise portals, B2B modernisationStrongPartial4.The Frontend CompanyContentful, Sanity, Strapi, DirectusDesign-led CMS integrationModeratePartial5.Cocoon AgencySanity + composable stack MACH architecture, composable commercModerateYes — philosophy-level6.Culture FoundryWordPress, Drupal, Craft CMS, Wagtailial-heavy orgs, traditional-to-headless advisoryModerateYes — across platform types7.PageproSanity (primary), Contentful, StrapiSanity builds, Next.js deliveryModerateNo — Sanity-first8.DotStarkKentico (primary), broader headlesMicrosoft/enterprise CMSModeratePartial9.SCubeStrapi, Contentful Fintech, structured contentModeratePartial10.SolGuruzCustom software + CMS integrationBroader platform buildsLimitedPartialHow we ranked these headless CMS agenciesWe did not use Clutch ranking position or DesignRush placement as primary signals. Platform partnership status was treated as a neutral data point — useful for establishing platform familiarity, but not evidence of multi-platform competence or advisory quality.Criteria and relative weight:Multi-platform CMS portfolio with verifiable production cases: 25%Verified client outcomes from reviews and case studies: 20%Content modeling and content architecture depth: 20%Migration track record with named scope and platforms: 15%Platform-agnostic advisory evidence: 10%ial and non-technical stakeholder focus: 5%Integration ecosystem breadth (DAM, CRM, search, eCommerce): 5%Web agencies and headless CMS development companies that consistently recommended the same CMS regardless of client context were penalised under this framework, not rewarded. The three agencies listed as special mentions — DotStark, SCube, and SolGuruz — were placed there, because headless CMS is either secondary to a broader generalist practice, platform coverage is very narrow, or verifiable headless-specific case evidence was limited.Top headless CMS agencies to hire1. FocusReactiveFocusReactive is an engineering-led headless CMS agency with official partnerships across Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, and Payload CMS, production experience on Directus, and a vendor-agnostic selection process backed by documented case studies showing different platforms deployed for different client contexts.OverviewFocusReactive operates across offices in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Poland, delivering across CET and ET timezones. Their work is built around four business outcomes: content systems that stay clean as editor count scales; genuine locale-specific publishing for multi-market organisations; marketing teams that launch campaigns without raising developer tickets; and businesses managing multiple brands from a single content architecture.Content modeling is treated as a primary design discipline rather than a setup task. Structured content types, reusable components, and governance rules are built into the schema from the start — so the system stays editorially consistent as teams and content volume grow. Permission structures, publishing approval chains, and content relationships are designed upfront to prevent structural debt as editorial teams expand.On AI SEO readiness, structured data and Schema.org markup are built into every project from day one. Content models are designed with machine readability alongside editorial usability — explicit entity relationships and clean semantic markup that allows AI crawlers to extract facts and cite the content as a canonical source, not only rank it in traditional search.Key services- Platform selection and content architecture consultancy- Headless CMS development and implementation across six platforms- CMS migrations from traditional and headless platforms- Localisation and multi-market content infrastructure- Next.js frontend development with performance and structured data built in- Technical audits of existing CMS and frontend stacks- Integration with DAMs, marketing tools, and third-party APIsFeatured case study — Arrive (EasyPark)Arrive, a mobility and transportation company, needed to consolidate a fragmented digital presence across multiple markets into a single unified platform that content editors could operate independently — across languages, countries, and product lines — without developer involvement.FocusReactive architected a composable platform on Storyblok and Next.js, deployed on Vercel, with a monorepo built in Turborepo housing a shared UI library, Storybook documentation, and a unified CI pipeline. The content model was built in Storyblok with structured schemas serving both editorial use and external systems. Internationalisation was implemented with dynamic routing and localised content per market.Results: 100+ UI components and 30+ CMS sections delivered; 4 markets served from a single content architecture; 97 Lighthouse performance score; +38% organic traffic post-launch; +61% organic impressions in the first 90 days.CMS platformsSanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload CMS, Directus, DatoCMS (official partnerships: Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Payload)Strengths- Widest verified CMS platform coverage on this list, with production cases across all six platforms- Explicit vendor-agnostic advisory with published platform comparison content and case studies showing different platforms used for different client contexts- CMS-Kit framework reduces implementation time and risk on common patterns- Content modeling and editorial workflow design treated as primary deliverables alongside frontend delivery- Localisation and multi-market infrastructure as a documented specialism- Offices in the Netherlands, UK, and Poland; CET and ET timezone coverageLimitations- Frontend delivery is Next.js-only — not suited to projects requiring PHP backends, Drupal builds, or Java-based enterprise stacks- No meaningful traditional CMS practice — organisations maintaining a WordPress or Drupal estate alongside a new headless build will need a separate resource for the legacy layer- Cloud-native CMS focus — on-premise or air-gapped deployments for regulated industries are not a documented part of their portfolioBest forOrganisations evaluating which headless CMS to use and wanting a genuine recommendation informed by project requirements. Teams rebuilding content infrastructure across multiple markets or channels. Projects where content modeling quality and editorial experience are treated as equal priorities to frontend performance.2. Anything AgencyAnything Agency is a UK-based headless CMS development company with over a decade of headless-only delivery, Contentful certification, and enterprise case studies demonstrating editorial transformation alongside technical delivery.OverviewAnything Agency has operated exclusively in the headless space for over ten years. Their primary platform is Storyblok, where they hold the UK and Ireland Partner of the Year designation. They also maintain a Contentful practice with Contentful certification, and their integration work spans Algolia for search and Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Salesforce for CRM, giving their delivery scope broader reach than most single-platform agencies.Their client portfolio spans enterprise brands, high-traffic media, and B2B organisations. A 12-year partnership with Netmums — a high-traffic parenting platform — is a marker of long-term editorial usability: a relationship of that duration only persists if the editorial experience continues to serve the team.They publish comparison content between Contentful and Storyblok with genuine trade-off analysis, which is evidence of platform-comparative thinking within their two-platform scope.Key services- Storyblok implementation, governance, and editorial training- Contentful implementation and migration- Discovery and content strategy- CMS migration from Umbraco, WordPress, and other platforms- CRM and search integration (Salesforce, MS Dynamics, Algolia)- Performance optimisation and analytics setupVerified client outcomesAmtico: migration from Umbraco 7 to Storyblok, with sub-1-second load times and a 100% SEO score. Shaftesbury Capital (This Is Soho): 110% increase in average engagement time and 290% increase in returning visitors following replatforming. Netmums: 12-year ongoing partnership managing a high-traffic media site. Quorn: multi-market headless implementation built for long-term scale.CMS platformsStoryblok (primary, UK & Ireland Partner of the Year), ContentfulStrengths- Headless-only delivery for over a decade- Enterprise case studies with editorial and engagement outcomes, not only technical metrics- CRM and search integration capability alongside the CMS practice- Long-term client partnerships as evidence of sustained delivery quality Limitations- Two-platform focus — not suited to projects where Sanity, Payload, or another platform outside their portfolio is the better architectural choice- UK-centric delivery team — relevant consideration for time-zone-sensitive projects outside EuropeBest forUK enterprise and scale-up organisations with a Storyblok or Contentful requirement where editorial autonomy, CRM integration, and long-term support are priorities.3. Bits OrchestraBits Orchestra is a headless CMS development company specialising in the modernisation of business-critical websites and portals in the .NET ecosystem, with verified CMS depth across Kentico, Umbraco, Contentful, Strapi, and Sanity.OverviewBits Orchestra holds Kentico Xperience Bronze Partner status alongside a documented practice in Umbraco, Contentful, Strapi, and Sanity. This combination — enterprise CMS expertise across both established .NET platforms and modern headless options — serves a real market segment: organisations with substantial .NET infrastructure who need to modernise content management without leaving their ecosystem.Their B2B portal capability covers operational content contexts — B2B, customer, eCommerce, enterprise, and news portals — which means their CMS delivery extends beyond marketing websites into content-embedded operational platforms. With 8+ years of experience and 130+ projects, the delivery volume is sufficient to have encountered the edge cases that distinguish real expertise from surface familiarity.Key services- CMS development and migration across Kentico, Umbraco, Contentful, Strapi, Sanity- B2B and enterprise portal development- Headless CMS implementation and API development- IT audit and system assessment- .NET custom development and Azure cloud services- Long-term maintenance and supportVerified client outcomesShaw Industries: enterprise-scale web development for a major global manufacturer.
Harold Grinspoon Foundation: non-profit platform delivery.
Coretec: manufacturing industry website and portal.
Multiple Clutch category recognitions including Top Consumer Product and Top Manufacturing.CMS platformsKentico (primary, Bronze Partner), Umbraco, Contentful, Strapi, SanityStrengths- Rare .NET and headless CMS combination serves a specific and underserved enterprise segment- Verified migration capability from legacy platforms including Kentico 13- Portal development depth covering operational content systems beyond marketing websites- ISTQB-certified testing practice built into deliveryLimitations- Kentico-primary positioning is less relevant for organisations outside the Microsoft CMS ecosystem- Cloud-native headless CMS depth is narrower compared to agencies whose primary discipline is headlessBest forEnterprise and mid-market organisations with .NET infrastructure needing to modernise web presence and content management. Manufacturing, retail, and B2B companies building operational portals where content management is embedded in business logic.4. The Frontend CompanyThe Frontend Company builds headless CMS solutions with a documented multi-platform practice across Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, and Directus, with a frontend-led delivery model.OverviewThe Frontend Company works across Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, and Directus with React and Next.js as their primary frontend stack. Their published content includes a headless CMS agency comparison guide. This headless CMS development company positioning is frontend-primary — the headless CMS serves the design and editorial experience rather than the other way around. This is a legitimate approach for a certain class of project, but it means content architecture and editorial governance may receive less emphasis than in agencies where CMS is the primary discipline.Key services- Headless CMS implementation across Contentful, Sanity, Strapi, Directus- Content modeling and CMS integration- Frontend development in React and Next.js- CMS migrations and legacy site modernisation- API integration and third-party connectionsCMS platformsContentful, Sanity, Strapi, DirectusStrengths- Multi-platform CMS portfolio across four headless platforms- Strong frontend and UX capability for design-driven implementations- Solid client review scores and referral rateLimitations- Frontend-primary positioning means content architecture and editorial governance are secondary concerns- Migration track record is less prominent than the top three agencies- CMS depth per platform appears shallower than agencies for whom headless CMS is the primary disciplineBest forOrganisations where the frontend experience is the primary deliverable and headless CMS is the supporting content infrastructure. Design-driven brands, e-commerce, and SaaS marketing sites where visual execution and performance are co-primary requirements.5. Cocoon AgencyCocoon Agency is a UK-based digital agency with 11 years of experience in composable and MACH-aligned architecture, positioning headless CMS within a broader composable stack rather than as a standalone product decision.OverviewCocoon Agency is explicitly platform-agnostic at the philosophy level. Their headless CMS services span technology selection and consultancy, implementation, replatforming and migration, and AI and omnichannel integration strategy. Their case studies cover complex B2B contexts: an intricate data and commerce platform for O2O serving over 4,000 retailers, and a content management transformation for ESG intelligence platform Integrum ESG.Their MACH orientation means they engage with the composable commerce and DXP ecosystem beyond CMS alone — relevant for organisations whose content management challenges are embedded in broader commerce or data architecture questions.Key services- Technology selection and CMS consultancy- Headless CMS implementation and integration- Replatforming and migration with data integrity focus- Composable commerce architecture- AI and omnichannel integration strategy- Custom software developmentCMS platformsSanity (documented primary), composable stack across vendor-agnostic selectionStrengths- Clear MACH and composable architecture philosophy aligned with the enterprise direction of the market- Handles complex B2B and omnichannel cases that simpler headless agencies avoid- 11 years of consistent headless and composable focusLimitations- Publicly documented multi-platform CMS breadth is narrower than the top two agencies — Sanity is the primary evidenced platform- Case study detail is lighter than ideal for procurement decisionsBest forOrganisations pursuing MACH architecture across content, commerce, and data as a unified programme. Complex B2B environments where content management is one component of a broader composable platform.6. Culture Foundry
Culture Foundry is a US-based digital agency with the widest traditional CMS platform coverage on this list, spanning WordPress, Drupal, Craft CMS, Wagtail, MODX, and Django, making them the strongest choice for organisations evaluating the full range of CMS architectural options.OverviewCulture Foundry's technology stack spans WordPress, Drupal, Django, Craft CMS, MODX, Wagtail, and Shopify, alongside GraphQL, Node.js, Python, and Go on the API layer. Their client profile includes 24 Hour Fitness, the NYRA and Belmont Stakes, the LBJ Presidential Library, the Clinton Digital Library, and the American Library Association — editorial-heavy organisations where content governance and long-term maintainability are primary concerns.Their relevance to a headless CMS shortlist is strongest when the decision is not yet settled: organisations evaluating whether to migrate from a traditional CMS, and to what, benefit from an agency that can advise across both traditional and headless options without a structural incentive to recommend the latter.Key services- CMS strategy and platform selection across traditional and headless options- WordPress, Drupal, Craft CMS, MODX, and Wagtail development- Custom headless builds with React.js and GraphQL- Managed hosting and long-term support- Search engineering and custom content applicationsCMS platformsWordPress, Drupal, Django, Craft CMS, MODX, Wagtail (headless: custom React/GraphQL builds)Strengths- Widest traditional CMS platform coverage on this list — genuine advisory capability across multiple architectural approaches- Deep expertise in editorial-heavy, content-governed industries- US-based team across multiple time zones with managed hosting infrastructureLimitations- Not a headless-first agency — organisations that have already committed to a cloud-native headless CMS will find more platform depth elsewhere- Headless-native CMS expertise (Contentful, Storyblok, Sanity) is limited compared to specialistsBest forOrganisations with existing traditional CMS estates evaluating whether and how to migrate to headless architecture. Media, education, library, and public sector organisations in the US where editorial governance is a primary requirement.7. Pagepro
Pagepro is a Sanity and Next.js specialist with Official Sanity Partner status, a 4.9 Clutch rating from 31 verified reviews, and enterprise clients including Pfizer, Orange Polska, and Ziff Davis.OverviewPagepro is based in Poland. Their CMS delivery is Sanity-first — their platform recommendation does not seem to meaningfully vary by client context, which limits their value as a platform-agnostic CMS advisor but not as a Sanity implementation partner. For organisations that have already selected Sanity, their depth on the platform — GROQ development, custom workflows, and a documented large-scale migration (GPnotebook: 30,000+ clinical articles rebuilt on Next.js and Sanity) — makes them a credible delivery option.Key services- Sanity CMS implementation, GROQ query development, and custom workflows- Next.js frontend development- Legacy CMS migration to Sanity- Contentful and WordPress migration services- Performance optimisation and technical auditsCMS platformsSanity (primary, Official Partner), Contentful, StrapiStrengths- Deepest Sanity platform expertise on this list- 4.9 Clutch rating from verified enterprise reviews- Proven migration track record with named, large-scale clientsLimitations- Sanity-first approach means recommendations are not platform-neutral- Less suited to projects where Storyblok, Payload, Directus, or another platform is the better fitBest forOrganisations that have selected Sanity and need deep implementation expertise. Scale-up and enterprise teams with complex content modeling requirements aligned with Sanity's content lake architecture.Special mentionsThe following three agencies have some relevance to headless CMS projects in specific contexts but ranked outside the main list — either because headless CMS is secondary to a broader practice, platform coverage is narrow, or verifiable headless-specific case evidence was limited.8. DotStark AgencyDotStark is a Kentico-primary agency with Microsoft ecosystem depth across Azure, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, and SharePoint. Their headless CMS services page covers standard service categories without the platform specificity or content modeling depth of the ranked agencies. Most relevant for organisations already embedded in Kentico and Microsoft infrastructure.9. SCubeSCube development agency, from New York, operates in contexts where content management intersects with data compliance and enterprise security, with a focus on Strapi and Contentful. Most relevant for fintech, financial services, and compliance-heavy organisations where CMS architecture must account for data residency and security requirements. Note: limited public case evidence was available during research for this article.10. SolGuruzSolGuruz is a custom software development company with AI-assisted engineering. Headless CMS is one integration component within broader platform builds rather than a primary specialism. Relevant for organisations building custom platforms where a headless CMS is one of several moving parts, and development velocity is a priority alongside CMS functionality.How to choose the right headless CMS agencyThe question most buyers get wrongMost organisations approach agency selection with the CMS platform already decided, or with a strong preference formed from a single source. A competent headless CMS agency will push back on a platform choice if the evidence does not support it. If an agency immediately validates your existing preference without asking about your editorial team's technical confidence, your content volume and type, your localisation requirements, or your integration landscape — that is a red flag, not a sign of alignment.In-house versus agencyBuilding headless CMS capability in-house is appropriate when the platform is already implemented, the implementation is stable, and the ongoing work is primarily editorial tooling and maintenance. Agency expertise adds clear value when you are evaluating which platform to use, migrating from a legacy CMS, expanding to multiple markets or channels, or building content infrastructure that your editorial team needs to operate without developer support.Budget ranges for 2026CMS platform selection consultancy only: $5,000–$20,000New headless CMS implementation, mid-complexity, single market: $30,000–$80,000Legacy CMS migration with content modeling redesign: $50,000–$150,000Enterprise multi-market or multi-brand headless infrastructure: $150,000–$400,000+An agency that provides a fixed quote before understanding your content model and integration requirements has not understood your project.Questions to ask before hiring a headless agencyWhich headless CMS platforms have you delivered in production in the last 18 months? Can you name the clients or describe the scope?Have you ever recommended against a client's preferred platform? What was the reason?What does your content modeling process look like, and who leads it — a developer or a content architect?Can we speak with an editorial stakeholder from a past project, not only a technical lead?What happens when editors encounter a use case the CMS model does not support? Self-assessment: do you need a headless CMS agency?Score each question 1–5 (1 = does not apply, 5 = strongly applies):1. Your current CMS requires developer involvement for routine content updates2. You need to deliver content across more than one channel or market3. You are planning a migration from a legacy CMS4. Your team lacks experience in content modeling or API-first architecture5. ial team independence from the development team is a business requirementScore 20–25: agency partnership is strongly indicated.
Score 12–19: consider agency support for setup and migration phases with in-house handover.
Below 12: in-house implementation is viable with guidance.Red flagsThe agency's own website runs on the same CMS they recommend for every clientCase studies only mention frontend metrics with no editorial or content outcomesAll testimonials are from developers or CTOs — none from editorial or marketing stakeholdersThe agency cannot explain the trade-offs of their recommended platform against its alternativesPlatform partnership status is the primary evidence offered for expertiseWhat does a headless CMS agency do?A headless CMS agency designs, implements, and governs API-first content management systems — platforms where the backend content store is decoupled from the frontend presentation layer. Content lives in structured fields delivered via API, and the frontend is built independently using whatever framework the project requires.In practice this covers: platform selection and advisory; content modeling (designing the content types, fields, relationships, and reusable components that will underpin the editorial experience); implementation and configuration; integration with commerce platforms, DAMs, CRM systems, and search tools; migration from legacy CMS platforms; editorial training and workflow design; and ongoing governance and maintenance.The distinction between a headless CMS agency and a web development agency that uses a headless CMS is meaningful. Most development agencies have one or two default platforms they apply consistently. A headless CMS specialist has deep production experience across multiple platforms, treats content architecture as a primary deliverable, and makes platform recommendations based on the client's editorial and technical context.Headless versus traditional CMS: the practical differencesA traditional CMS couples content management with the presentation layer. The CMS generates HTML, controls page templates, and determines how content is displayed. This makes initial setup fast — but creates rigidity at scale. Changing the frontend requires changes to the CMS. Delivering content to a mobile app, a voice interface, or a second regional website requires duplication or workarounds.A headless CMS removes that coupling. Content is stored in structured fields and delivered via REST or GraphQL APIs. This frontend-first model is often described as headless web development, where websites and applications consume content from the CMS via APIs rather than being generated inside the CMS itself. Multiple frontends can draw from the same content store. ial and development teams can work in parallel. Platform upgrades on either side do not require simultaneous changes to the other.The practical benefits for 2026 deployments: faster frontend load times through static generation and edge caching; editorial independence from the development release cycle; structured content that can feed AI-driven personalisation and search; and genuine omnichannel delivery without content duplication.The practical costs: higher initial implementation complexity; content modeling decisions that require more upfront expertise to get right; and editorial experiences that vary significantly depending on platform choice and implementation quality.When to hire a headless CMS agency: Four scenarios1. Legacy CMS migration with SEO and content integrity requirementsOrganisations on monolithic CMS platforms with substantial indexed content face a migration risk that in-house teams frequently underestimate. A poorly executed migration to headless can result in permanent loss of organic search rankings. Headless CMS development companies with documented migration experience manage content transformation, URL mapping, redirect implementation, and structured data preservation as a single coordinated process.2. Omnichannel content delivery across markets or channelsWhen content needs to reach a website, a mobile app, a partner portal, and an internal tool from a single source, the content model must be designed for omnichannel delivery from the start. Retrofitting this into an existing implementation is expensive. An agency that has designed multi-channel content architectures will make different modeling decisions upfront than one that treats the website as the primary consumer.3. ial team autonomy without developer dependencyMany headless CMS implementations are technically clean but practically unusable without developer involvement for routine editorial tasks. Platform selection and content modeling decisions determine whether editors can work independently or whether every page change requires a ticket. Agencies with strong editorial design practice treat this as an architecture problem, not a training problem.4. Multi-market and multi-brand content infrastructureOrganisations expanding into new markets or managing multiple brands on a shared content platform face localisation, governance, and publishing workflow challenges that require deliberate architectural decisions. These include locale-specific content modeling, permission structures for different editorial teams, and content relationships that work across multiple frontends drawing from a shared source.FAQs What is a headless CMS agency?A headless CMS agency or headless CMS development company designs, implements, and governs API-first content management systems where the content backend is decoupled from the frontend presentation layer. A genuine headless CMS agency recommends the right platform for each client context, requiring practical expertise across multiple headless platforms.How is a headless CMS agency different from a web development agency that uses headless CMS?Most web development agencies have one or two default headless CMS platforms they apply consistently. A headless CMS specialist has deep production experience across multiple platforms, treats content architecture and editorial workflow as primary deliverables, and makes platform recommendations based on client requirements rather than tooling familiarity.Which headless CMS platforms are most widely used by specialist agencies in 2026?Contentful, Storyblok, and Sanity CMS cover most use cases. Contentful is strongest for enterprise structured content at scale. Storyblok is strongest when editorial visual editing and team autonomy are priorities. Sanity is strongest for developer-controlled custom content modeling. Payload CMS and Directus are increasingly chosen when the CMS and application need to share a codebase or database. DatoCMS is common in Jamstack and performance-critical deployments.How much does a headless CMS implementation cost in 2026?A new implementation from a headless CMS development company for a mid-complexity site typically costs $30,000–$80,000. Migrations from legacy platforms, especially those involving content modeling redesign, usually range from $50,000–$150,000. Enterprise multi-market or multi-brand projects delivered by an experienced headless CMS development company typically start at $150,000. Platform licensing is separate, as cloud-native headless CMS solutions involve monthly or annual subscription costs that scale based on usage and feature tier.What should I look for in headless CMS agency case studies?The most informative case studies name the platform selected and explain why, describe the content modeling decisions made, document editorial outcomes (publishing speed, reduction in developer dependency, governance improvements), and include technical outcomes (load time, SEO stability through migration). Case studies that only describe the frontend redesign or list technology names without explaining content architecture decisions are not evidence of CMS expertise.Should I select a CMS platform before choosing a headless agency?Not necessarily. If you have a well-reasoned requirement that clearly aligns with a specific platform’s strengths, it can be sensible to choose the platform first and then find a headless CMS development company with deep expertise in it. However, if you are still evaluating platforms, it is often a stronger approach to work with an agency that has production experience across multiple options and can provide guidance without a commercial bias.What is the difference between a headless CMS and a composable DXP?A headless CMS manages and delivers content via APIs. A composable Digital Experience Platform assembles multiple best-of-breed components — content management, commerce, personalisation, search, DAM — into a unified architecture via APIs and a shared data layer. Headless CMS is typically the content management component within a composable DXP. The MACH Alliance framework (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, Headless) describes the architectural principles that composable DXPs follow.
This guide is editorially independent. No headless CMS development company paid for inclusion or placement. Platform partnership status was treated as a data point for platform familiarity, not as a ranking signal. Clutch and G2 review data was used as a source of verified client feedback, not as a ranking input.

Come and learn how you can supercharge your modern and secure applications using GraphQL and Javascript. In this workshop we will build a GraphQL API and we will demonstrate the benefits of the query language for APIs and what use cases that are fit for it. Basic Javascript knowledge required.

Today every developer is using LLMs in different forms and shapes. Lots of products have introduced embedded AI capabilities, and in this workshop you’ll learn how to build your own AI application. No experience in building LLMs or machine learning is needed. Instead, we’ll use web technologies such as JavaScript, React and GraphQL which you already know and love.

This SvelteKit workshop explores the integration of 3rd party services, such as Storyblok, in a SvelteKit project. Participants will learn how to create a SvelteKit project, leverage Svelte components, and connect to external APIs. The workshop covers important concepts including SSR, CSR, static site generation, and deploying the application using adapters. By the end of the workshop, attendees will have a solid understanding of building SvelteKit applications with API integrations and be prepared for deployment.

The modern web would be different without rich client-side applications supported by powerful frameworks: React, Angular, Vue, Lit, and many others. These frameworks rely on client-side JavaScript, which is their core. However, there are other approaches to rendering. One of them (quite old, by the way) is server-side rendering entirely without JavaScript. Let's find out if this is a good idea and how Remix can help us with it?
Prerequisites- Good understanding of JavaScript or TypeScript- It would help to have experience with React, Redux, Node.js and writing FrontEnd and BackEnd applications- Preinstall Node.js, npm- We prefer to use VSCode, but also cloud IDEs such as codesandbox (other IDEs are also ok)

Join us for a 3-hour workshop that dives into the world of creative React development using Codux. Participants will explore how a visually-driven approach can unlock creativity, streamline workflows, and enhance their development velocity. Dive into the features that make Codux a game-changer for React developers. The session will include hands-on exercises that demonstrate the power of real-time rendering, visual code manipulation, and component isolation all in your source code.
Table of the contents: - Download & Setup: Getting Codux Ready for the Workshop- Project Picker: Cloning and Installing a Demo Project- Introduction to Codux Core Concepts and Its UI- Exercise 1: Finding our Feet- Break- Exercise 2: Making Changes While Staying Effective- Exercise 3: Reusability and Edge Case Validation- Summary, Wrap-Up, and Q&A

You have been tasked with creating a collaborative text editing feature within your company’s product. Something along the lines of Notion or Google Docs.
CK 5 is a feature-rich framework and ecosystem of ready-to-use features targeting a wide range of use cases. It offers a cloud infrastructure to support the real-time collaboration system needs. During this workshop, you will learn how to set up and integrate CK 5. We will go over the very basics of embedding the editor on a page, through configuration, to enabling real-time collaboration features. Key learnings: How to embed, set up, and configure CK 5 to best fit a document editing system supporting real-time collaboration.
Table of contents:- Introduction to the CK 5 ecosystem.- Introduction to a “Notion-like” project template.- Embedding CK 5 on a page.- Basic CK 5 configuration.- Tuning up CK 5 for a specific use case.- Enabling real-time editing features.

Localized content helps you connect with your audience in their preferred language. It not only helps you grow your business but helps your audience understand your offerings better. In this workshop, you will get an introduction to localization and will learn how to implement localization to your Contentful-powered Remix website.
Table of contents:- Introduction to Localization- Introduction to Contentful- Localization in Contentful- Introduction to Remix- Setting up a new Remix project- Rendering content on the website- Implementing Localization in Remix Website- Recap- Next Steps

Passwordless authentication may seem complex, but it is simple to add it to any app using the right tool. There are multiple alternatives that are much better than passwords to identify and authenticate your users - including SSO, SAML, OAuth, Magic Links, One-Time Passwords, and Authenticator Apps.
While addressing security aspects and avoiding common pitfalls, we will enhance a full-stack JS application (Node.js backend + React frontend) to authenticate users with OAuth (social login) and One Time Passwords (email), including:- User authentication - Managing user interactions, returning session / refresh JWTs- Session management and validation - Storing the session securely for subsequent client requests, validating / refreshing sessions- Basic Authorization - extracting and validating claims from the session token JWT and handling authorization in backend flows
At the end of the workshop, we will also touch other approaches of authentication implementation with Descope - using frontend or backend SDKs.

In this workshop we will learn how to build a personal blog from scratch using Remix, TailwindCSS. The blog will be hosted on Vercel and all the content will be dynamically served from a separate GitHub repository. We will be using HTTP Caching for the blog posts.
What we want to achieve at the end of the workshop is to have a list of our blog posts displayed on the deployed version of the website, the ability to filter them and to read them individually.
Table of contents: - Setup a Remix Project with a predefined stack- Install additional dependencies- Read content from GiHub- Display Content from GitHub- Parse the content and load it within our app using mdx-bundler- Create separate blog post page to have them displayed standalone- Add filters on the initial list of blog posts

Intro to serverlessPrior Art: Docker, Containers, and KubernetesActivity: Build a Dockerized application and deploy it to a cloud providerAnalysis: What is good/bad about this approach?Why Serverless is Needed/BetterActivity: Build the same application with serverlessAnalysis: What is good/bad about this approach?

Software Containers are quickly becoming an essential tool in every developer's toolbelt. They make it easy to share, run, and scale code. In this talk you'll learn how to use Docker to write better, more sharable software. In this workshop Sr. Developer Advocate at Docker, Shy Ruparel, will walk you through getting started with Docker. He'll covers setting up Docker, running your first container, creating a basic web application with Python and Docker, and how to push the Docker Image to DockerHub. He'll share why you'd even want to use containers in the first place and how they enable a developer to write better, more shareable software.

API's/Backends are difficult and we need websockets. You will be using VS Code as your editor, Parcel.js, Chakra-ui, React, React Icons, and Appwrite. By the end of this workshop, you will have the knowledge to build a real-time app using Appwrite and zero API development. Follow along and you'll have an awesome chat app to show off!

How to build a fullstack GraphQL application (Postgres + NestJs + React) in the shortest time possible.
All beginnings are hard. Even harder than choosing the technology is often developing a suitable architecture. Especially when it comes to GraphQL.
In this workshop, you will get a variety of best practices that you would normally have to work through over a number of projects - all in just three hours.
If you've always wanted to participate in a hackathon to get something up and running in the shortest amount of time - then take an active part in this workshop, and participate in the thought processes of the trainer.

Building modern web applications is riddled with complexity And that's only if you bother to deal with the problems
Tired of wiring up onSubmit to backend APIs and making sure your client-side cache stays up-to-date? Wouldn't it be cool to be able to use the global nature of CSS to your benefit, rather than find tools or conventions to avoid or work around it? And how would you like nested layouts with intelligent and performance optimized data management that just works™?
Remix solves some of these problems, and completely eliminates the rest. You don't even have to think about server cache management or global CSS namespace clashes. It's not that Remix has APIs to avoid these problems, they simply don't exist when you're using Remix. Oh, and you don't need that huge complex graphql client when you're using Remix. They've got you covered. Ready to build faster apps faster?
At the end of this workshop, you'll know how to:- Create Remix Routes- Style Remix applications- Load data in Remix loaders- Mutate data with forms and actions

Node.js has become an increasingly popular language to build and deploy backend APIs. In a world of legacy CMSs adopting decoupled implementations, plenty of frameworks have sprung up to classify themselves as "headless" CMSs, designed from the start to provide an easy way to personalize content models, administer permissions and authentication, and serve a content API quickly.
Strapi, one of the leaders in this space, has recently released their v4 version of the framework, and with Platform.sh it can be deployed alongside a number of frontends within the same project, giving a drastically simplified development experience working with decoupled sites. In this workshop, we'll deploy a Strapi demo application, which has been configured to serve a restaurant review site.
Piece piece you will add database services, tests, and frontends, all within the safety of isolated development environments. At the end, each user will have a functioning decoupled site, and some greater understanding of working with decoupled sites in production.

In this workshop, we'll build a React app from zero to one using a GraphQL API from Nhost.

Table of contents:
- Sign up to Nhost and create a Nhost app
- Create database table
- Set up React app
- Install Nhost and GraphQL dependencies
- Display data in React app
- Let users sign in
- Add GraphQL API permissions

The Vue3 has been released in mid-2020. Besides many improvements and optimizations, the main feature of Vue3 brings is the Composition API – a new way to write and reuse reactive code. Let's learn more about how to use Composition API efficiently.

Besides core Vue3 features we'll explain examples of how to use popular libraries with Vue3.

Table of contents:
- Introduction to Vue3
- Composition API
- Core libraries
- Vue3 ecosystem

Prerequisites:
IDE of choice (Inellij or VSC) installed
Nodejs + NPM

Hasura is a free and open-source GraphQL Engine that can help supercharge your GraphQL adoption, whether it is for a new application or for an existing one. The workshop will cover:
- A basic introduction to GraphQL- Using GraphQL to make CRUD operations from a React application- Setting up access controls to data- Building real-time components in React using GraphQL Subscriptions- Wrapping existing REST APIs with GraphQL servers that can be deployed on serverless platforms, and then merging them into a single endpoint using Remote Schemas- Triggering serverless functions on database events- In short, we’ll go through how React developers can adopt realtime GraphQL and serverless.