Now, for this magic to happen, for this output to be created, you have to ensure that the data which is being taken by a third party model is not retained. So the moment the output is created, that data has to be destroyed. So major corporations like for example, Salesforce, they work with OpenAI and they have contracts in place. It's up to the organization using it to ensure that these contracts are respected, or of course, if you have the option, you can have your own locally hosted model, which significantly reduces the risk and danger of your data being leaked.
So once that is done, it is sent, the generation happens, that's where the output comes out. Now that's not the end of the story, because you also need to make sure that the output that you're going to be sending out to the public does not contain toxicity, like bad language or slangs, or controversial opinion. And of course, hallucinations, which LLMs are still well known for, is that they make factual mistakes, but it appears, I mean, they do it in a way that looks, that is true, that is correct and true. So you just have to be a bit careful about that. Finally, it is important for you to keep an audit trail to ensure that you know who was responsible for which step, at which step did something go wrong, so that you can track back, you can understand what the mistakes were and fix it for any future purposes.
Finally, once you're satisfied with the output, then it's time to send it to your marketing apps, like your CRM systems, your advertising systems, any APIs, or any points of data exchanges where this information will be used to disseminate to your audience. So that is just a high-level view of a security framework. Now, obviously, it's not possible for every company to build it themselves. Most of the major companies providing AI tools do come with their own, you know, some kind of a security or a trust layer. And that's when, if you want to use third-party systems, absolutely, feel free to do it, but just make sure that there is a limited customization there. And of course, there could be compliance concerns and data security risks, because if those companies get into trouble, they get hacked or something, your data is also going to be out there in the market after that. The other option, extreme option, is to build something in-house.
Now, that is usually an option that I'm seeing more and more of these tech-focused, highly technical companies approach. So, for example, there is this OTA in Southeast Asia, which is hosting everything locally, very sophisticated use of the tools that are being built around their LLM system. The only problem is that this requires a lot of resources, intensive training, and you need to make sure that the team which is building this is working closely with marketing, because that would be a challenge, and most of you with experience would know that it is not really easy to get the marketing team to work alongside a tech team. So just be aware of that. And number three are hybrid systems. Now, this kind of combines the best of both. The only problem is that this requires significant increase in management overhead and integration complexity. And whenever there are updates to one system, you need to make sure that the other system is compliant and it's working together.
Comments