So, okay, that was a lot. Now there are some big updates coming. We know about the specs and about some legal updates. What do we do? Accessibility is a huge topic, and there's a lot of deep dives you can go into, tons of resources and testing tools, whole talks on implementation and training and design considerations.
So, I'll share a little bit, just a slice, about how those of us in the accessibility field approach it and how you can advocate to implement it in your companies. I'll leave the technical implementation up to you, but I'm going to focus for today's presentation on the software development life cycle and here's what I mean by that. We plan by gathering requirements, we design and develop, if we're lucky, we QA and launch. And in 2024, most companies use the Agile model, of course.
When we're talking about accessibility, though, there's also an audit. An audit shows where we may be lagging in accessibility. Often this is yearly, although sometimes it's more. And an accessibility audit is usually where companies concentrate all of their accessibility efforts and spending. Don't focus everything on this audit. This is reactive. If you're doing an audit and then fixing it only every year, that is very reactive. So, we're really shipping every day.
In 2024, teams are still missing accessibility issues in all their earlier stages of development. So, if any team at any point can introduce accessibility issues, what do we do? We start to, and we're seeing this across a lot of companies, implement processes to catch accessibility issues early and often. This is following many other models that we have seen in the software industry. But accessibility, for some reason, has been pretty far behind. In my work, I do this. I think about accessibility strategy at companies, about the whole picture. In planning, are we considering using alternative use cases? Are we building our personas with disabilities? Are we reviewing with subject matter experts at any stage of the process? In research, are we including disabled participants? In design, are we using accessibility plugins and annotations? In engineering, are we using lenders, automated checks to check for accessibility? Are we using semantic code when possible? Are we using a design system? Is it accessible? And when we go to launch, are we testing with assistive technology, both in manual QA and automated QA?
You also may see more frequent audits that are good. And what we see here is that this is really proactive accessibility. And this is where we're headed in 2024. Companies need to push this way. Now that we've gone through what disability and accessibility is at its core, specs and laws, to wrap up, I really want to return to how we define accessibility at work. Accessibility is a requirement, not a feature. It is practices and principles we adopt to ensure we make things accessible. And I also think of accessibility as everyone's responsibility. Now, okay. Go advocate for change at your companies. Implement engineering processes for accessibility and start the conversations early. Thank you. And have a great rest of your conference. I'll leave you with a few great resources here in the slide deck to get started. And feel free to reach out. Bye.
Comments